Posts

Absolute relationship hierarchy for Socionics or DCNH

Absolute relationship hierarchy cannot be named, because each relationship serves different purposes for different lives in different situations. They are different pieces of a grand alchemical puzzle, and the great work (which gives transcendent meaning) is beyond any concrete purpose. It is the job of relationships to energetically supply purpose (Te-Fi duality), rather than the relationship being the fundamental priority to which energy must cater.  Relationships must always serve truth and purpose. So an out of context absolute hierarchy (Ti) cannot be named for relationships: the relationships are more like letters of alphabet which write the story of our lives. Some letters are indeed used a lot more and for good reason, but you sometimes need to use a rare letter. This also gives a beautiful image of language spontaneously forming behind a transcendent purpose or drive.

Host Eric vs Jack: Socionics Debate

Image
Jack's definition of Objective/Subjective: Objective communication does not require re-interpretation because it is based on something external (logic/sensing). whereas Subjective communicative does require re-interaction (ethics/intuition). -Eric considers this abnormal, points out that you have to tell the truth about something like a shirt color for example so there is an element of objectivity that has nothing to do with the object at all, you can be wrong about an object and make false statement. Aren't we looking for people's ability to access the information equally? -Jack: no, people don't necessarily have access to the information equally, but when they see the information they both see the same thing -Eric: what is a subjective piece of information? -Jack: requires re-interpretation, an abstract epiphany, whatever occurs in your head you can't communicate it to me without concretizing it -Eric: so thinks that are abstract are subjective, and if yo...