Varlawend: Mysteries Among the Stars

Video:  link Screenshots from the hangout:  link (Personal commentary in square parentheses.) Number of phenomena in psyche: Supervision, Benefit, etc. Model A —Supervision rings (information); Model G —Benefit rings (energy). Right types better absorb Model A Socionics; Left more interested in Model G. Vaserlan: Is it because of mixing things up from many sources? Not necessarily. Intuitives deal with such things. “Combining different types of theories is something right types like ENTPs also do—Ausra, Socionics is the result of that.” Fundamental to Ne. +/- assigned not to spin, but charge (Gulenko). Theory of Reinin Dichotomies: Right types prefer to have visitors at their homes (territory) while Left types prefer to visit others. (VG doesn’t support this idea.) Right sequential; simple to complex; trees growing (branches from stems); a forest of trees. SEE/SEI Right types; first function Sensing (simple problems), move to Feeling (complex so

ILE-ESI ESE-ILI SEI-LIE LII-SEE EIE-SLI SLE-EII LSI-IEE IEI-LSE --- These are relations of brewing conflict beneath the surface. The degree of psychological compatibility in this relationship is minimal. However, this is not immediately obvious. Conflict partner often seems attractive. He evokes a feeling of awe by showing his high level of development of characteristics and style of thinking in which you yourself are weak. Contact and convergence at first seem possible, but on the way there things seem to persistently go wrong. Pondering why these attempts to find common language do not work out, one comes to conclusion that the cause of misunderstanding is not that significant and easily removable. It is only necessary to invest some more effort and your partner will understand you. There is persistent unwitting desire to somehow positively predispose this person to yourself. However, these attempts are like walking on the edge of a chasm – there is always a danger of falling int

ILE-ILI ESE-ESI SEI-SEE LII-LIE EIE-EII SLE-SLI LSI-LSE IEI-IEE --- These are relations of unstable distance i.e. partners find it difficult to establish the right psychological distance. It can be achieved only when they are interacting alone. Appearance of third person has a devastating effect: competition and arguments being to surface (competition of verbal functions), which sometimes degenerates into caustic debates. Nobody wants to drop their credibility in the eyes of the third party, as debate will center around strong functions of each partner. Partners become impressed by the manner the other behaves in company, by his cordiality and warmth. This facilitates the transition to closer distances. When communicating in a group, psychological climate suddenly begins to change. Introvert partner gradually becomes alienated. Relations lose their warmth, become formal, wariness appears. Both secretly begin to regret previously moving towards more intimate and open relations. To t

The DCNH subtype system of Humanitarian Socionics versus MBTI, Big Five, DISC Typologies 1. Background.  DCNH subtypes system of Humanitarian Socionics in comparison with other four-fold typologies The DCNH system appeared in the late 90s, when I realized that the socionic type is too broad a category to explain human behavior by a limited set of certain fixed qualities.  Since I was not worried about informational metabolism, but about the real actions of people in specific situations, I quickly discovered that the type is variable in a very wide range.  Among representatives of the same type, the differences are so great that an independent external observer does not agree to attribute them to the same mental makeup. Conducting trainings and experiments on socionics, I noticed that during the formation of the group there is an inevitable distribution of internal roles and what role you end up with will depend not so much on the type, but on which functions you have been stron