Posts

Showing posts from May, 2019

Relations in one temperament. Humanitarian Socionics

Relationships are linearly assertive.  Socionics  Relationship in one temperament This temperamental group includes the relations: Activation (AK), Quasi-Identity (HF), Direct Order (PZ) and Reverse Order (OZ).  These relationships have the highest energy.  Therefore, their effect in the dyad activates, accelerates, increases energy.  The key word conveying the temperamental action of this four of relationships is ACTIVATION. 1. Symmetric (two-way) activation Activation (AK) - vital activation.  Partners communicate energy impulse to each other in everyday life.  There is not so much help each other as mutual pushing to perform difficult or unpleasant tasks. Quasi-identity (CV) - mental activation.  Mental activity is stimulated in such a dyad.  To understand each other, you need to significantly strain. 2. Directional (one-sided) activation Direct order (PP) - transferred from the customer to the sub-custom work activation.  Very productive attitude in practice.  Is of ad

Compatibility law. Humanitarian Socionics

I want to summarize my many years of experience studying the relations between communicative objects with different properties.  This question is the key when the task of creating coherent teams with the consistent inclusion of participants dependent on each other is being solved.  Let me formulate the law of compatibility without specific bindings to the types and types of their activities (this is why I used the adjective “common”). The law of compatibility fits into four statements. 1. When resources are insufficient (for example, external conditions are unfavorable or the system is depleted due to age), then maximum compatibility is found between objects with contrasting characteristics (compatibility of opposites). 2. If there are many resources (around a favorable environment, an excess of energy in youth, etc.), then compatibility will occur between communicative objects that have similar properties that are close to each other (similarity compatibility). Comfort scale

Comfort scales intertype relationships. Compatibility of types in socionics

How to understand compatibility?  By compatibility, everyday thinking usually means the degree of comfort in interpersonal relationships.  Determine what comfort is much easier.  Comfort is the absence of tension, the availability of amenities, a good physical and psychological state of the subject.  In this definition, there is a direct connection with the socionic aspects of S and E. In the dictionary of psychology, I find that interpersonal compatibility is a mutual acceptance in joint activities.  What activity is meant?  If any, then such a definition is just a fiction, because an experienced psychologist will tell you that absolute compatibility does not exist.  If we mean work, then we are talking only about a particular case of compatibility.  There are many understandings of compatibility, they all reflect different aspects of human life. Socionics  There is no one who is equally compatible with you in all situations. Intertype Relations in Humanitarian Socionics Co