Varlawend: Mysteries Among the Stars

For more:  https://varlawend.blogspot.com/2018/10/brief-descriptions-of-socionics-types.html Alpha Quadra Ne+ Rings: Revolution, Determinist, Ideation Process, Transition of feminine to masculine, Beta/Delta formal transition (seed) Stabilities : Flexible-Maneuvering, Associative, Restructure, Iridescent Hopes, Viscosity Mission : Alpha, Research, Uniqueness, Business, Experiment Intuition of Prospects, Searching for the new, exploring, inventing, taking risks, trying to be original, demonstrating ability Fe+ Rings: Transformation, Vortex, Concrete Results, Transition of masculine to feminine, Beta/Delta natural transition (spread) Stabilities: Linear-Assertive, Distributive, Guardian, Realistic Plans, Crystallinity Mission: Alpha, Social, Prestige, Passion, Experiment Ethics of Positive Emotions, being happy, expressing enthusiasm, being friendly and open with people, sharing the joy of living Si- Rings: Evolution, Dialectical, Con

http://www.socioforum.su/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=68264 Fill in?

Man as a System of Types by  Krig the Viking Published on 10-01-2011 04:56 PM  Number of Views: 4953   0   Comments   Original Article in Russian here. Translator's Note: Gulenko uses his own form of notation for the Information Elements, as follows: Se = F ( factor , force) Ne = I ( intueor , idea) Te = P ( profiteor , profit) Fe = E ( emoveo , emotion) Si = S ( sensus , sensation) Ni = T ( tempus , time) Ti = L ( lex , logic) Fi = R ( relatio , relation) He has also renamed the blocks of Model A to base them on Jung instead of Freud, as follows: Ego = Ego Super-Ego = Persona Super-Id = Anima/Animus Id = Shadow However, this is somewhat odd, as he also refers to the "Ego Type" as the traditional Socionics type, and the "Persona Type" as his new "energy type". He doesn't seem to explain this discrepancy anywhere. V. Gulenko; Man as a System of Types. The Problem of Diagnosis of the Ego and Persona This art

Vladimir Ledin. Comparing Paradigms of the School of Humanitarian Socionics and the School of Systems Socionics September 21, 2006 12:00 am Categories:  Methodology and Philosophy Content: Notes: Before turning to the actual comparison itself, I think it is worth briefly explaining what and why it will be compared. The concept of paradigm in its modern interpretation introduced Thomas Coon into the philosophy of science in his work “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions” (1962).  Initially, this concept had some duality - a paradigm is a certain set of samples of problem statement and their solution (not only at the level “how to formulate”, but also at the level that will be considered as a problem at all and what its solution is).  At the same time, a paradigm is some general set of methods for evaluating a theory that help a researcher to understand what is good and what is bad in this science - a hypothesis that coincides with the general direction of the develop