Compatibility law. Humanitarian Socionics

I want to summarize my many years of experience studying the relations between communicative objects with different properties. This question is the key when the task of creating coherent teams with the consistent inclusion of participants dependent on each other is being solved. Let me formulate the law of compatibility without specific bindings to the types and types of their activities (this is why I used the adjective “common”).
The law of compatibility fits into four statements.
1. When resources are insufficient (for example, external conditions are unfavorable or the system is depleted due to age), then maximum compatibility is found between objects with contrasting characteristics (compatibility of opposites).
2. If there are many resources (around a favorable environment, an excess of energy in youth, etc.), then compatibility will occur between communicative objects that have similar properties that are close to each other (similarity compatibility).
Intertype Relations in Humanitarian Socionics
3. With average resource provisioning compatibility will be intermediate. There are two cases here. Since the intermediate situation is dynamic, we always have two tendencies - either a deterioration of resources or an improvement.
3.1. When the resource base deteriorates, objects with partially opposite features (compatibility of semi-opposites) are more compatible.
3.2. In case of improvement, on the contrary, objects with partially similar features (compatibility of semi-affiliations) will be compatible. In these cases, compatibility will increase over time.
I do not know whether it makes sense to call this pattern the general law of compatibility. Time will tell. I still think that this is not just a figment of fantasy, but an experimentally verifiable, through a number of special cases, conclusion.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SHS Subtypes Reference 2022

Another more advanced article on subtypes that has been published, not meant as a replacement for this article but which further supplements it:  https://varlawend.blogspot.com/2024/07/advanced-shs-subtype-theory-and-practice.html?m=1 … Previously I wrote an article on Dual Subtypes which spurred a lot of thought, but it is out of date and our conception of Complex Subtypes has grown a lot since then. There is a lot of material about this which is private and even more in-depth than what I will share here, but I want to share the basics so that people can build on it as they please and in a more up-to-date way. ... First, some basic subtype descriptions, just for the sake of reminder: Dominant subtype: Terminating, Contacting, Connecting -Formula: PF(E) -Role: Ambitious Hastening Leader -Temperament: Linear-Assertive The dominant subtype is distinguished by the following behaviors in the group: -set to compete -often recognized by others as a leader -sets clear goals and is well f...
Read more

Psychosophy Clubs and Sextas

Four types, combined by common strong and weak functions form a club . Representatives of one club, as a rule, have common interests, a similar life position and often occupation. In communication, we can subconsciously feel the representative of our club, we are drawn to it. In this case, you should pay particular attention to the fact that the club is not a quadra, and if the values ​​of the club partner’s quadra do not match yours (pseudophilia or half-pseudophilia relations), then with prolonged communication or friendships / love relationships there may be serious misunderstanding, for example, in the case of ELFV and LEVF. In any case, the club always has a place for joint activities, especially self-expression of strong functions and their useful and adequate criticism of these actions. EF Club Strong Emotion and Physics, Weak Will and Logic Representatives: Pushkin (EFVL), Bukharin (EFLV), Borgia (FELV), Dumas (FEVL) Motto: "Masters of seduction" The mos...
Read more

My General Understanding of Psychosophy

WORK IN PROGRESS!!! Possible Function Properties: Functions 1 & 4: Result, Effective, Coarse-Grained, Unconscious, Stable, Monologue Functions 2 & 3: Process, Assiduous, Fine-Grained, Conscious, Fussy, Dialogue Functions 1 & 3: Dominant, Motivated, Introverted, Self-Centered Functions 2 & 4: Adaptable, Flexible, Extroverted, Other-Centered Functions 1 & 2: Fearless, Liberated, Natural Functions 3 & 4: Doubting, Conditional, Maturing 1st Function: Result, Effective, Coarse-Grained, Unconscious, Stable, Monologue, Dominant, Motivated, Introverted, Self-Centered, Fearless, Liberated, Natural 2nd Function: Process, Assiduous, Fine-Grained, Conscious, Fussy, Dialogue, Adaptable, Flexible, Extroverted, Other-Centered, Fearless, Liberated, Natural 3rd Function: Process, Assiduous, Fine-Grained, Conscious, Fussy, Dialogue, Dominant, Motivated, Introverted, Self-Centered, Doubting, Conditional, Maturing 4th Function: Result, Effective, Coarse-Grained, Un...
Read more