Normalizing versus Hemispheric

Normalizing versus Hemispheric


The right hemisphere is known to be responsible for figuratively sensory perception. This includes, on the one hand, artistic thinking (intuition), but also, on the other hand, motor orientation in the physical space (sensory). In particular, the high coordination of movements characteristic of athletes is proof of their right hemisphere.
But how do opposite functions coexist? - Nothing strange, I already wrote a lot about the equivalence of intuition and sensorics (in the case of the same vertices). Thus, a right-hemisphere person is primarily a creative type variant. It enhances the irrational functions, plus an additional function "E". I add that harmonizers (H-subtype) are mainly related to the right-hemisphere ones, though they are still a transitional case.
But what about the left hemisphere? Purely left hemisphere is an N-subtype. A moderate left hemisphere is a D-subtype.
A good criterion for distinguishing hemisphere is unambiguity or ambiguity. For right-brain thinking, alternatives co-exist - two mutually exclusive relationships become complementary. As the property of an electron to be both a wave and a particle. Left hemisphere work poorly with ambiguous contexts, holistic systems. For them, the law of unambiguous constant choice of several alternatives applies.
If we take the example of composers, then this is a well-known contradiction between the right-hemisphere Mozart and the left-hemisphere Salieri.
And now about the relationship between "C" and "N". They are varieties of psychological induction and reduction. “C” turns on “N” (direct energy pulse), and “N” turns off “C” (reverse energy pulse). This is happening now, it will be so in the future. Because there are objective laws of humanitarian socionics that are independent of our desires.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SHS Subtypes Reference 2022

Another more advanced article on subtypes that has been published, not meant as a replacement for this article but which further supplements it:  https://varlawend.blogspot.com/2024/07/advanced-shs-subtype-theory-and-practice.html?m=1 … Previously I wrote an article on Dual Subtypes which spurred a lot of thought, but it is out of date and our conception of Complex Subtypes has grown a lot since then. There is a lot of material about this which is private and even more in-depth than what I will share here, but I want to share the basics so that people can build on it as they please and in a more up-to-date way. ... First, some basic subtype descriptions, just for the sake of reminder: Dominant subtype: Terminating, Contacting, Connecting -Formula: PF(E) -Role: Ambitious Hastening Leader -Temperament: Linear-Assertive The dominant subtype is distinguished by the following behaviors in the group: -set to compete -often recognized by others as a leader -sets clear goals and is well focus
Read more

Psychosophy Clubs and Sextas

Four types, combined by common strong and weak functions form a club . Representatives of one club, as a rule, have common interests, a similar life position and often occupation. In communication, we can subconsciously feel the representative of our club, we are drawn to it. In this case, you should pay particular attention to the fact that the club is not a quadra, and if the values ​​of the club partner’s quadra do not match yours (pseudophilia or half-pseudophilia relations), then with prolonged communication or friendships / love relationships there may be serious misunderstanding, for example, in the case of ELFV and LEVF. In any case, the club always has a place for joint activities, especially self-expression of strong functions and their useful and adequate criticism of these actions. EF Club Strong Emotion and Physics, Weak Will and Logic Representatives: Pushkin (EFVL), Bukharin (EFLV), Borgia (FELV), Dumas (FEVL) Motto: "Masters of seduction" The mos
Read more

My General Understanding of Psychosophy

WORK IN PROGRESS!!! Possible Function Properties: Functions 1 & 4: Result, Effective, Coarse-Grained, Unconscious, Stable, Monologue Functions 2 & 3: Process, Assiduous, Fine-Grained, Conscious, Fussy, Dialogue Functions 1 & 3: Dominant, Motivated, Introverted, Self-Centered Functions 2 & 4: Adaptable, Flexible, Extroverted, Other-Centered Functions 1 & 2: Fearless, Liberated, Natural Functions 3 & 4: Doubting, Conditional, Maturing 1st Function: Result, Effective, Coarse-Grained, Unconscious, Stable, Monologue, Dominant, Motivated, Introverted, Self-Centered, Fearless, Liberated, Natural 2nd Function: Process, Assiduous, Fine-Grained, Conscious, Fussy, Dialogue, Adaptable, Flexible, Extroverted, Other-Centered, Fearless, Liberated, Natural 3rd Function: Process, Assiduous, Fine-Grained, Conscious, Fussy, Dialogue, Dominant, Motivated, Introverted, Self-Centered, Doubting, Conditional, Maturing 4th Function: Result, Effective, Coarse-Grained, Un
Read more