Notes on Hangout #21: Left vs Right Spinners

Video: link
Screenshots from the hangout: link
(Personal commentary in square parentheses.)
  • Number of phenomena in psyche:
    • Supervision, Benefit, etc.
  • Model A —Supervision rings (information); Model G —Benefit rings (energy).
  • Right types better absorb Model A Socionics; Left more interested in Model G.
    • Vaserlan: Is it because of mixing things up from many sources?
      • Not necessarily. Intuitives deal with such things. “Combining different types of theories is something right types like ENTPs also do—Ausra, Socionics is the result of that.” Fundamental to Ne.
  • +/- assigned not to spin, but charge (Gulenko).
  • Theory of Reinin Dichotomies: Right types prefer to have visitors at their homes (territory) while Left types prefer to visit others. (VG doesn’t support this idea.)
  • Right sequential; simple to complex; trees growing (branches from stems); a forest of trees.
    • SEE/SEI Right types; first function Sensing (simple problems), move to Feeling (complex solutions).
  • Left: complex to simple; branches to trunk.
    • ESI/ESE Left; move from complex Feeling problems to simple Sensing solutions.
  • simple vs complex = making things simpler vs more complex; dynamic feature.
  • LSI law/rule-making: starts out simple but becomes complex; bureaucratic; LII: starts with existing complex systems with unclear logic and makes it simpler.
    • LSI wants to go into more detail in his work than the LII
    • LII wants to get the whole picture and then start asking questions; Right types will start digging at a particular piece of info right away; L+
  • EII vs ESI:
    • EII digs deeper, goes into detail and tries to achieve the ideal; perfectionistic in relationships
    • ESI simply fine: if relationships don’t work-cuts them off.
  • Social Level:
    • Left types express their functions 'naturally'; Right types express functions as dictated by society:
      • EII Feeling is societal, pro-social, altruistic. Doesn’t exist in nature (altruistic/trusting).
      • Ethics of nature is survival of the fittest: protect yourself, then kin, everything else later.
      • SLE Se natural, stronger dominates over the weaker (food chain) [but chimp hierarchy example: pro-social/bonding + strong alpha males rule longer than tyrannous Se- type rulers].
      • SEE Se coalitions, societal in nature. Divide and conquer or dominating a stronger one artificial.
      • Societal ethics: everyone should survive. Nature oriented towards smaller groups.
  • NLP fundamentally ‘Right'. Only Right types fall for it. (Easily brainwashed/manipulated.) [Operant conditioning.] [Although Dynamics more susceptible to advertisements since associative tricks: happiness associated with buying a certain product, etc.]
  • Ne- (intuition of exiting) vs Ne+ (intuition of entering; better at finding problems) :
    • [Ne] risking/adventure/solving non-standard problems [Hero’s journey, basic human explorative instinct]
      • Complex problem: ENFP solves better (Left: complex to simple).
      • ILE’s Ne good at finding problems but may get stuck (Right: linear). Not good at getting out of problems (ENFP is).
      • Street fight: ENTP likely to get stuck, participate; ENFP likely to find a way out. IEI will act like an ILE, not looking for a way out [Positivist]. Right types have a tendency to get stuck in. IEE will stand by and make ironic comments, gets beaten up.
  • Life-style/Social level:
    • Left types approach doing things at home/work quickly but not well.
    • Left types capable of delivering good quality: go back and forth until they reach it.
    • Right types like doing things thoroughly start-to-finish and don’t like going back.
    • Listening to music helps focus on a process: only for Right types [Talanov: low threshold Sensing (Carefree)]. Left types tend to get more distracted by the music than motivated/focused.
    • Cooking: Right types usually clean at the end. Left types usually clean during the process. Left types: easier to pause, clean up and go back.
    • Body movements of Right types smoother; Left types have more jerks.
    • Fine handiwork [Carefree]. Long surgery: LSI—feel better in the Process.
  • Only on Social Level is justified that we call them Process/Result types. Otherwise, grossly oversimplified [goal/method is strategic/tactical].
  • EII vs IEI:
    • Process types [or EII] focused on development of relationships over time. Can be prognostic about how relationships will develop. So what’s the different between prognosis (on a left/right basis)?—two parameters: long-term vs short-term prognosis—how detailed it is: general or specific:
      • EII: Ethics to more complex function (Intuition). More detailed prognosis but shorter. Ask EII if interested to see how it will unwind in the process. More suited for psychotherapy/psychoanalysis (detailed).
      • IEI: More complex to simpler function. General prognosis but long term. Ask IEI if interested in the end result. More suited for conflict resolution/counselling to build relationships (who to avoid/approach).
  • Better to work with same spin types. Better understanding and outcomes.
  • EP types tend to switch from one activity to another but Left types do this more abruptly. Right transition smoother.
  • Besides E/I, Left/Right the most important since it defines (second only to E/I) how comfortable the relations will be and how interactions will develop.
  • Also important while building a team. Same spin.









Natalya

May 29, 2019
Could you explain the differences between the restrictive functions of types with different signs? I would like to know the example of the following types: * What is the difference between a weak Observational Structural Logic (L-) and a weak Administrator Logic (L +)? * Relationship Ethics (R +) Mentor of Relationship Ethics (R-) Enthusiast? * Sensory comfort (S-) Politics from sensory comfort (S +) Marshal?

Victor Gulenko

First of all, it is necessary to take into account that positivism (+) means actions to maximize the positive manifestation of a function, and negativism (-) to minimize its negative manifestation. The weakness of this function is not informational, but energetic: according to it, a person notices everything and convincingly argues, but hardly realizes his plans in real behavior.
The administrator is very worried about how to maintain order and stick to the accepted plan (+ L), and the Entrepreneur is about how to get rid of the mess and rebuild the unfortunate plan (-L). The mentor is concerned about how to build and maintain a good relationship (+ R), and for an Enthusiast how to avoid or break a bad relationship (-R). The politician ensures that there is no dirt, illness, pain and other discomfort (-S) on his territory, and the Marshal controls aesthetics, health and the availability of amenities (+ S). 
Signs of functions in the process of life, of course, may vary. The model indicates their initial setting.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Psychosophy Clubs and Sextas

Four types, combined by common strong and weak functions form a club . Representatives of one club, as a rule, have common interests, a similar life position and often occupation. In communication, we can subconsciously feel the representative of our club, we are drawn to it. In this case, you should pay particular attention to the fact that the club is not a quadra, and if the values ​​of the club partner’s quadra do not match yours (pseudophilia or half-pseudophilia relations), then with prolonged communication or friendships / love relationships there may be serious misunderstanding, for example, in the case of ELFV and LEVF. In any case, the club always has a place for joint activities, especially self-expression of strong functions and their useful and adequate criticism of these actions. EF Club Strong Emotion and Physics, Weak Will and Logic Representatives: Pushkin (EFVL), Bukharin (EFLV), Borgia (FELV), Dumas (FEVL) Motto: "Masters of seduction" The mos
Read more

SHS Subtypes Reference 2022

Previously I wrote an article on Dual Subtypes which spurred a lot of thought, but it is out of date and our conception of Complex Subtypes has grown a lot since then. There is a lot of material about this which is private and even more in-depth than what I will share here, but I want to share the basics so that people can build on it as they please and in a more up-to-date way. ... First, some basic subtype descriptions, just for the sake of reminder: Dominant subtype: Terminating, Contacting, Connecting -Formula: PF(E) -Role: Ambitious Hastening Leader -Temperament: Linear-Assertive The dominant subtype is distinguished by the following behaviors in the group: -set to compete -often recognized by others as a leader -sets clear goals and is well focused on them -ambitious, although sometimes claims the opposite -agrees only to temporary compromises -needs victory above all else -behaves decisively in difficult situations, shows high performance, indicates what to do and who is going
Read more

My General Understanding of Psychosophy

WORK IN PROGRESS!!! Possible Function Properties: Functions 1 & 4: Result, Effective, Coarse-Grained, Unconscious, Stable, Monologue Functions 2 & 3: Process, Assiduous, Fine-Grained, Conscious, Fussy, Dialogue Functions 1 & 3: Dominant, Motivated, Introverted, Self-Centered Functions 2 & 4: Adaptable, Flexible, Extroverted, Other-Centered Functions 1 & 2: Fearless, Liberated, Natural Functions 3 & 4: Doubting, Conditional, Maturing 1st Function: Result, Effective, Coarse-Grained, Unconscious, Stable, Monologue, Dominant, Motivated, Introverted, Self-Centered, Fearless, Liberated, Natural 2nd Function: Process, Assiduous, Fine-Grained, Conscious, Fussy, Dialogue, Adaptable, Flexible, Extroverted, Other-Centered, Fearless, Liberated, Natural 3rd Function: Process, Assiduous, Fine-Grained, Conscious, Fussy, Dialogue, Dominant, Motivated, Introverted, Self-Centered, Doubting, Conditional, Maturing 4th Function: Result, Effective, Coarse-Grained, Un
Read more