Correlation of Nardi Magic Diamond 16 functions to Gulenko 64 subtype profiles
Warning: These correlations are NOT strict. They can be violated by unique development.
-Manager Te: ILE-D, SLE-D, SLE-N, LSI-D, LIE-D, ILI-D, LSE-D
-Builder Te: ILE-N, LIE-N, LSE-N, SLI-N
-Ideologue Ti: LSI-N, ILI-N
-Systemist Ti: LII-C, LII-N
-Shepherd Fe: ESE-D, EIE-D, SEE-D
-Host Fe: ESE-N, SEI-C, SEE-N, IEE-N
-Quester Fi: EII-D
-Romantic Fi: IEI-N, EII-C, EII-N
-Mover Se: SLE-C, LSI-C, LSE-C, SLI-D, SLI-C
-Sensate Se: ESE-H, SEI-H, SLE-H, SEE-H, ESI-C, SLI-H
-Defender Si: ESI-D, ESI-N
-Hearth Si: SEI-N, LSI-H, ESI-H, LSE-H
-Marketer Ne: ILE-C, ESE-C, SEI-D, EIE-C, IEI-D, SEE-C, LIE-C, IEE-D, IEE-C
-Catalyst Ne: ILE-H, IEI-C, LIE-H, ILI-C, IEE-H
-Visionary Ni: LII-D, EIE-N
-Oracle Ni: LII-H, EIE-H, IEI-H, ILI-H, EII-H
I don't know V man, is this measuring the same thing as masculine,feminine in OP, or something totally different?
ReplyDeleteBecause in his book he claims this is what can be used to determin subtype in almost the very sense of model G. So any relation to initiating terminating, or ignoring connecting?
DeleteI’m not sure of my correlation by any means; it’s only meant to be loose. And true, he does correlate his ideas to DCNH subtype in the book. But, it was a loose correlation and not that much reasoning was given.
DeletePretty sure it was (first letter is judgment style, second is perception style):
AA = Dominant
AH = Normalizing
HA = Creative
HH = Harmonizing
There’s still plenty to work about regarding this.
Not sure about the relationship to OP masculine and feminine. But that would be fascinating to think about.
DeleteYeah that was my understanding as well. Your the man in the english speaking world for model G, so i thought I would check in with you on that.
DeleteFirst glance screamed out to me as muscling vs feminine coins from OP. The idea that those are what determine (probably should say corralates) to DCHN sub was interesting for sure.