The main contradiction of modern socionics

The main contradiction of modern socionics

Opening remarks word on the meeting of the SHS on June 7, 2008
1. In addition to the external difficulties that modern socionics have encountered, there are still more serious difficulties, splitting and weakening the socionic movement from within. The internal tension in socionics is slowly but steadily increasing.
2. What is the source of this voltage? - The contradiction between the humanitarian and technical poles in socionic knowledge comes to the forefront more than ever .
It slightly resembles the confrontation between the technocratic pressure of the West, atomizing and alienating people, and the ancient wisdom of the East, uniting and supporting people through their inclusion in a harmonious system of social relations, where everyone has a worthy place. (Watching a video interview with C.K. Jung).
Jung
Unfortunately, our contemporaries took the worst from the west - greed and combined it with the worst from the east - clanism.
3. We are representing the humanitarian wing of modern socionics - a trend of dissenters, even dissidents. We are not verbally, but by deed, bringing socionics closer to the needs of specific people, practitioners. We carry out intensive explanatory work. We are not satisfied with the one-sidedness and absolutism of socionics - orthodoxes, for whom the best relationship is duality, the best group is quadra, the best type is ILE, the best scheme is Model A.
4. Let us judge time and practice. Here are our next tasks:
  • Develop an understandable ideology uniting us (or strategy is our way, Tao)
  • To prove experimentally the validity of our theoretical system,
  • To strengthen financially and organizationally for successful competition in the market of modern humanitarian services,
  • To educate professionals and reliable followers of our humanitarian path.
Posted by Victor Gulenko at 6:05 pm 

Comments

  1. Drew COctober 2, 2020 at 2:40 PM

    Yes, these are worthy goals. May many people help in their attainment.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Psychosophy Clubs and Sextas

Four types, combined by common strong and weak functions form a club . Representatives of one club, as a rule, have common interests, a similar life position and often occupation. In communication, we can subconsciously feel the representative of our club, we are drawn to it. In this case, you should pay particular attention to the fact that the club is not a quadra, and if the values ​​of the club partner’s quadra do not match yours (pseudophilia or half-pseudophilia relations), then with prolonged communication or friendships / love relationships there may be serious misunderstanding, for example, in the case of ELFV and LEVF. In any case, the club always has a place for joint activities, especially self-expression of strong functions and their useful and adequate criticism of these actions. EF Club Strong Emotion and Physics, Weak Will and Logic Representatives: Pushkin (EFVL), Bukharin (EFLV), Borgia (FELV), Dumas (FEVL) Motto: "Masters of seduction" The mos
Read more

SHS Subtypes Reference 2022

Previously I wrote an article on Dual Subtypes which spurred a lot of thought, but it is out of date and our conception of Complex Subtypes has grown a lot since then. There is a lot of material about this which is private and even more in-depth than what I will share here, but I want to share the basics so that people can build on it as they please and in a more up-to-date way. ... First, some basic subtype descriptions, just for the sake of reminder: Dominant subtype: Terminating, Contacting, Connecting -Formula: PF(E) -Role: Ambitious Hastening Leader -Temperament: Linear-Assertive The dominant subtype is distinguished by the following behaviors in the group: -set to compete -often recognized by others as a leader -sets clear goals and is well focused on them -ambitious, although sometimes claims the opposite -agrees only to temporary compromises -needs victory above all else -behaves decisively in difficult situations, shows high performance, indicates what to do and who is going
Read more

My General Understanding of Psychosophy

WORK IN PROGRESS!!! Possible Function Properties: Functions 1 & 4: Result, Effective, Coarse-Grained, Unconscious, Stable, Monologue Functions 2 & 3: Process, Assiduous, Fine-Grained, Conscious, Fussy, Dialogue Functions 1 & 3: Dominant, Motivated, Introverted, Self-Centered Functions 2 & 4: Adaptable, Flexible, Extroverted, Other-Centered Functions 1 & 2: Fearless, Liberated, Natural Functions 3 & 4: Doubting, Conditional, Maturing 1st Function: Result, Effective, Coarse-Grained, Unconscious, Stable, Monologue, Dominant, Motivated, Introverted, Self-Centered, Fearless, Liberated, Natural 2nd Function: Process, Assiduous, Fine-Grained, Conscious, Fussy, Dialogue, Adaptable, Flexible, Extroverted, Other-Centered, Fearless, Liberated, Natural 3rd Function: Process, Assiduous, Fine-Grained, Conscious, Fussy, Dialogue, Dominant, Motivated, Introverted, Self-Centered, Doubting, Conditional, Maturing 4th Function: Result, Effective, Coarse-Grained, Un
Read more