School of Humanitarian Socionics

http://zanoza.socioland.ru/wiki/%D0%A8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B0_%D0%93%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D1%81%D0%BE%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8

School of Humanitarian Socionics

Established in 1993 by Victor Gulenko . The moment of creation is described on the website of the ShGS sociolib.info:
... the beginning of the history of the School, as an organized group of like-minded people, is considered to be January 19, 1993, when the first regular courses of humanitarian socionics opened in the Kiev district of Bereznyaki. Of the people who passed these courses around V. Gulenko, over time, a group of activists was formed, which, from personal experience, became convinced of the prospects of this trend and voluntarily joined in the research work.
ShGS website sociolib.info (deleted in 2017)
At different times, the School bore different names (Gulenko School, School of Ethical Socionics), the current form of the name — the School of Humanitarian Socionics (SGS) was established only around 2003, and it became widely known under this name.
One of the most famous ShGS projects is the socionic citation index project .
"
So far, just socionics no longer exist. It was divided into two directions - informational and humanitarian, just as intelligence was initially explored as IQ, and now as EQ. Humanitarian socionics works within the framework of the energy, rather than the informational paradigm.
"
- Victor Gulenko https://socionics.jimdo.com/

School staff

The School includes:

School sites

Until 2006, the school has no official website (Dmitry Pavlov served as the school’s plenipotentiary representative).
In February 2002, Yuriy Stebelsky created the website http://socionics.kiev.ua , dedicated to the school of Victor Gulenko. C April 4, 2006 this site was the official site of the SHGS. In 2017, this site stopped working.
In June 2010, the domain http://socioniks.net was registered , which later opened a new official website of SHGS, which is still the same (2017).
In May 2011, the ShGS Facebook page was created https://www.facebook.com/humanitarian.socionics/ In 2017, it had 600 subscribers.
Another site referenced by the ShGS Facebook page is https://socionics.jimdo.com/ .

Humanitarian Socionics Platform

The mission (goal) of socionics is to become the scientific worldview of a civilized society of the fourth quadra period (a society of 4 quadras is a mature society with highly developed but not destroying ecology forces and humane labor values, in which cooperation prevails over competition). The modern world is aging, moving to 4 quadras. 
The main scientific task of socionics is the prediction of the behavior of people and their groups in various situations and environmental conditions. 
The main applied task of socionics is the development of methods for creating working groups for a specific task, conditions, etc.

Principles of humanitarian socionics

  1. Socionics is a humanitarian science and not exact (soft, probabilistic systems).
  2. Multi-level model of the psyche (subtypes, subpersonalities, different levels of consideration, etc.).
  3. The principle of interactivity - without knowing the environment, you cannot know how the type will behave, etc.
  4. The main focus is behavior. It’s not what a person says about himself, but what and how he does.
  5. Communicative space (close / distant communication distance, at school and at home, etc.).
  6. Principle of relativity. There is no monopoly on absolute truth. There is always an equivalent logical explanation. There are no extremes (“model cretinism” or relational fatalism).
  7. Using analogies and imaginative comparisons that stimulate thought experiment and brainstorming.
  8. The principle of interdisciplinary openness (borrowed successful methods, the desire for synthesis, openness to dialogue with other sciences).
Source: "The Credo of Humanitarian Socionics" http://uchoniyartist.blogspot.com/2012/04/blog-post_8789.html

Theoretical basis of SHGS

The School of Humanitarian Socionics has a very extensive theoretical basis and a large number of theoretical developments in socionics, being one of the most prolific socionic schools in this regard.

Functional role names (names) of types

Instead of the pseudonyms proposed by Aushra, functional socionic names (names) of types are used in humanitarian socionics. For example: "Humanist" - carries the idea of ​​reconciliation of people, calling "Seeker" - making discoveries, "Inspector" - keeping the system in order, etc. However, the names should not be taken literally: for example, it is wrong to believe that every "Critic" is all criticizes indiscriminately (as well as assume that every Robespierre is a ruthless dictator in his heart)

Writing functions in Latin letters

Instead of graphic images of mental functions in humanitarian socionics use Latin letters.
Gulenko proposed the following notation for functions:
  • E - "Ethics of emotions" from the Latin. the words "Emoveo" - excite, shake.
  • R - "Ethics of relations" from Lat. the words "Relatio" - attitude.
  • R - "Business Logic" from Lat. the words "Profiteor" - perform useful actions.
  • L - "Structural logic" from lat. the words "Logos" - the rule, the rule.
  • S - "Sensory of comfort" from lat. the words "Sensus" is a sensation.
  • F - "Power Sensory" from Lat. the words "Factor" - influencing, influencing.
  • T - "Intuition of time" from Lat. the words "tempus" - time.
  • I - "Intuition of opportunities" from the Latin. the words "Intueor" - I see, penetrating eyes.
Source: "Pavlov D. The name matters" https://socioniks.net/article/?id=237

The energy component of the psyche

Classical socionics focuses on information metabolism (MI) on how a person perceives and processes information, makes decisions and issues processed information. Humanitarian socionics emphasizes energy metabolism (EM), i.e. on what a person does, on what actions he has enough energy, on his behavior, and not on what he says.

Psychological distance

In Humanitarian Socionics, there are two psychological distances: long and short.
  • When interacting over a long distance, people are separated by a significant distance, their communication is largely subject to conscious and social control. This distance usually occurs between strangers or in groups of more than eight people.
  • Close distance means that communication takes place with close contact in space and is characterized by spontaneity (a greater degree of influence of the unconscious). This distance is most characteristic for groups of up to eight people, especially if they know each other well.
An extrovert in society (at a long distance) shows activity, sociability, efficiency, but coming home (going to close distance) becomes like an introvert, much less active. Introvert, on the contrary - at an effective distance takes an observant position and at the closest active one.

Model G - Gulenko Energy Model

In Humanitarian Socionics, as the main one, the energy model of the psyche is used - Model G, which was proposed by Gulenko in 1995. The energy model does not cancel Model A, but complements it to a single model of energy-informational metabolism (EIM).
Read more about the energy model in the article Model G
Model G on the website ShGS - https://socioniks.net/article/?id=113

DCNH subtypes, multilayered psyche structure

ShGS is considered to be that the human psyche consists of the following layers:
  1. Sociotype - the deep core of the psyche. Constant throughout life. Its hardest to "see" because it is hidden under the following layers of the psyche
  2. Subtype - medium, relatively stable layer of the psyche. It can change throughout life, under the influence of strong life shocks and persists for periods of tens of years. Manifested as a person's inclination to play / borrow? specific role in the group. A subtype is:
    1. Dominant (D) - active in achieving its goals, in which all possible resources are involved. Group leader
    2. Creative (C) - non-standard perception of situations, bringing a new one, which allows the group to develop. Idea's generator.
    3. Normalizing (N) - identifying, establishing and maintaining norms and rules. The closer does the majority of the work in the group.
    4. Harmonizing (H) - prefers to stand aside and observe, intervenes in the situation only when its harmony is broken. If the influence failed to distance itself from the situation physically and psychologically. Proofreader, feedback.
  3. Accentuation - the most "soft" and moving layer of the psyche. Strengthening one of the mental functions. As a rule, not very adequate behavior for this function. There is so far it is necessary to adapt to the current environment.

Thus, the full sociotype is written as: - -

Intertype relationships, duality

In humanitarian socionics, the names of intertype relationships (AI) proposed by Aushra are used, but the semantics of some of them are significantly revised. For example, it is considered that the Activation relationship at first really activates the partners, but later there is a “overheating” up to a “de-activation”. In the description of Aushra, the relationship of activation is simply "the most optimal for any common cause relationship of support, protection and activation" [1]
It is assumed that there are no uniquely good or uniquely bad IOs, the same IO can be both good and bad depending on the context. For different tasks, different IOs will be optimal. For example, identity and activation relationships are good for quick results, but they are bad for living together. Because in the long period of time the initial burst of intensity of the identical relations disappears, it becomes boring and not interesting with each other, and in the relations of activation there is overheating and the partners want to move away from each other, in extroverts this happens very quickly, in introverts slower
This approach means that with the observance of certain rules it is possible to significantly increase the comfort of any relationship.
Relationships at close range at ShGS are considered from the perspective of Introvert Socionics , which claims that at close range relations prevail over types. Those. the initial, going from childhood, orientation to certain relationships will determine the choice of a partner, and not the relation that determines the partners as in the extroverted socionics of Aushra. For example, if one of the partners is focused on domination in a pair, is not ready to take a partner "on an equal footing", is not ready to give him primacy, then it is very doubtful that dual relations would develop in this pair. Even if the partner is a dual, the relationship itself will be asymmetric in nature and cannot be considered dual, where equality and leadership change is required.
"
Duality is opposites that alternate. If they do not alternate, they will conflict.
"
- Victor Gulenko
Separately, it should be said about muzzle relations. They are very "romanticized" in modern [2]socionics. Humanitarian socionics considers dual relations as dialectical relations, where the struggle of opposites is always present, because the duals have three Jungian dichotomies different and only one coincides. At the duals periodically arise and resolve contradictions. Dual relationships are treated as relationships without a clear leader; duals must learn to transfer leadership to each other. At long range, an extrovert leads in society, and at close range, at home, leadership takes over to an introvert. And only with time, having passed the grinding, the duals begin to appreciate each other. Dual relationships are suitable for people who are set to work on themselves, to take an opposite view of the world. Often this happens in the second half of life. Dual relationships are almost never established at first glance, in order

Diagnostics of a sociotype

In humanitarian socionics, complex diagnostics is used. The main methods are interviewing and monitoring the nonverbal behavior of the respondent. As additional, it is used: the method of quick discussions, the method "draw oneself and give oneself the characteristics of their 4 words", the method of drawing "house, tree and me", questioning, etc.
The duration of the interview is 15–30 min at seminars and up to 60 min in the case of individual diagnostics [3] . If the interview is too long, the respondent gets tired and begins to give answers "if only it is over quickly", so the duration should be optimal, so that the respondent is not tired but has had time to show himself.
The basic rules for conducting socionic interviews with the HS are as follows [4] :
  1. At the beginning of the interview to endear a person to yourself.
  2. Communication must be carried out via several channels (visual and audible).
  3. Alternative questions should be avoided (questions like "or - or").
  4. Refine respondent answers. (Tell us more, give examples ...)
  5. Watch for emotional reactions.
  6. Do not ask complicated, contrived questions.
  7. Do not get involved in questions about tastes.
  8. Analyze both the results and the course of the interview.

Temperaments

Temperaments are formed by a combination of two dichotomies: Extra-Introversion and Ratio-Irrationality. Temperament characterizes the intensity of energy exchange with the environment, as well as the change in intensity over time. An important role in the understanding of temperament is played by the Static-Dynamics dichotomy. Statics gives the psyche - balance, stability, and the dynamics on the contrary - excitability, anxiety.  
  • Linearly-Assertive, Choleric (Extrovert + Rational, Speaker) The most energetic, quick-tempered people, constant high activity until “complete exhaustion” and only then rest. Obsession on one thing. Frequent mood swings.
  • Agile and Agile, Sanguine (Extrovert + Irrational, Static) Vigor is combined with the ability to quickly change the direction of impact, well oriented in extreme situations. Easily go from the excited to the relaxed state.
  • Balanced and Stable, Phlegmatic (Introvert + Rational, Static) Low energy, but measured and reliable performance. Stable emotional state, the mood does not change during the day. High level of self-control.
  • Susceptible Adaptive (Introvert + Irrational, Speaker) Able to adapt to the surrounding conditions of existence with minimal energy consumption. Inactive, depending on the changing internal rhythms mode of operation, but feel subtle when you need to show situational activity. High sensitivity and impressionability, leading to frequent mood swings.

Installation on the type of activity

The attitudes to the type of activity belong to the category of the first socionic groups recommended for the study, so the person - carrier of the type suggests the main direction for finding a professional realization.
Four groups of installations on the type of activity are formed using a combination of the Yung polarities "logic - ethics" (degree of orientation towards people or an objective, nonpersonal factor) and "sensory - intuition" (degree of material embodiment of activity products). The third polarity, “aristocracy - democracy”, is also involved in the formation of these groups. However, it is customary to disclose these signs in detail when considering other important groups - quadras.
Installation on the type of activity:
  • Technical and managerial installation (Managerial). The greatest benefits are brought in the formal structures of management, as well as in the field of engineering and material production.
  • Socio-communicative installation (Social). Most effective in the sphere of distribution and social communications (trade, supplies, services, health care, catering, social welfare, entertainment, etc.).
  • Humanitarian installation. (Humanitarian). Sociotypes that are designed to work with the ideal side of human culture - spirituality, worldview, ideology, religion, literature and art, the humanities, education, personal development, psychological assistance.
  • Research installation (Scientist) Their mission is a scientific-theoretical and experimental study of the surrounding world by objective, reproducible methods.

The attitudes to the type of activity are widely used in socio-analysis for evaluating the working collective according to the criterion of effectiveness. Effective in a competitive environment will only be the group whose key participants are representatives of the installation, within which lies the task solved by the group.

Meetings of SHGS

Since the beginning of the 2000s, under the leadership of Victor Gulenko , the Kiev Club of Humanitarian Socionics "Evrika" has been working where students of the State Civil Society and people interested in socionics meet to get new knowledge and exchange opinions. Information about the meetings is published on the Facebook page humanitarian.socionics
Also, from 2014, Socionic Cafe in Kiev has been operating which has a more popular format than a club and is held in various cafes of the city of Kiev.

Old school logo

ShGS logo

Examples of diagnostics of a sociotype in ShGS

Seeker (ILE) Igor Weissband, diagnoses Kirill Kravchenko https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mivmgYQ-eQU
Marshal (SLE), diagnoses Kirill Kravchenko https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmuDmWwrQrc
Inspector (LSI), diagnoses Kirill Kravchenko https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqSwkDkCAEI
Entrepreneur (LIE), diagnoses Cyril Kravchenko https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yedRsD27Zg
Humanist (EII), diagnoses Cyril Kravchenko https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kT7c0xE7j0
Advisor (IEE), diagnoses Kirill Kravchenko https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f19TNYJgeMc

Notes

  1. Jump↑ Augustinavichiute A. THEORY intertype relationships http://socionic.info/download/intertyp-new.pdf
  2. Jump up↑ At the time of 2017
  3. Go↑ Socionic Diagnostics http://uchoniyartist.blogspot.com/2014/05/DIAGNOSTICA.html
  4. Jump↑ socionic diagnostics. Interview method https://socioniks.net/article/?id=193

Links

External links

This article is one of the good articles of the Zanoza project.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SHS Subtypes Reference 2022

Another more advanced article on subtypes that has been published, not meant as a replacement for this article but which further supplements it:  https://varlawend.blogspot.com/2024/07/advanced-shs-subtype-theory-and-practice.html?m=1 … Previously I wrote an article on Dual Subtypes which spurred a lot of thought, but it is out of date and our conception of Complex Subtypes has grown a lot since then. There is a lot of material about this which is private and even more in-depth than what I will share here, but I want to share the basics so that people can build on it as they please and in a more up-to-date way. ... First, some basic subtype descriptions, just for the sake of reminder: Dominant subtype: Terminating, Contacting, Connecting -Formula: PF(E) -Role: Ambitious Hastening Leader -Temperament: Linear-Assertive The dominant subtype is distinguished by the following behaviors in the group: -set to compete -often recognized by others as a leader -sets clear goals and is well focus
Read more

Psychosophy Clubs and Sextas

Four types, combined by common strong and weak functions form a club . Representatives of one club, as a rule, have common interests, a similar life position and often occupation. In communication, we can subconsciously feel the representative of our club, we are drawn to it. In this case, you should pay particular attention to the fact that the club is not a quadra, and if the values ​​of the club partner’s quadra do not match yours (pseudophilia or half-pseudophilia relations), then with prolonged communication or friendships / love relationships there may be serious misunderstanding, for example, in the case of ELFV and LEVF. In any case, the club always has a place for joint activities, especially self-expression of strong functions and their useful and adequate criticism of these actions. EF Club Strong Emotion and Physics, Weak Will and Logic Representatives: Pushkin (EFVL), Bukharin (EFLV), Borgia (FELV), Dumas (FEVL) Motto: "Masters of seduction" The mos
Read more

My General Understanding of Psychosophy

WORK IN PROGRESS!!! Possible Function Properties: Functions 1 & 4: Result, Effective, Coarse-Grained, Unconscious, Stable, Monologue Functions 2 & 3: Process, Assiduous, Fine-Grained, Conscious, Fussy, Dialogue Functions 1 & 3: Dominant, Motivated, Introverted, Self-Centered Functions 2 & 4: Adaptable, Flexible, Extroverted, Other-Centered Functions 1 & 2: Fearless, Liberated, Natural Functions 3 & 4: Doubting, Conditional, Maturing 1st Function: Result, Effective, Coarse-Grained, Unconscious, Stable, Monologue, Dominant, Motivated, Introverted, Self-Centered, Fearless, Liberated, Natural 2nd Function: Process, Assiduous, Fine-Grained, Conscious, Fussy, Dialogue, Adaptable, Flexible, Extroverted, Other-Centered, Fearless, Liberated, Natural 3rd Function: Process, Assiduous, Fine-Grained, Conscious, Fussy, Dialogue, Dominant, Motivated, Introverted, Self-Centered, Doubting, Conditional, Maturing 4th Function: Result, Effective, Coarse-Grained, Un
Read more