Typological Integrity of the Socion: Education on the Jungian Basis of the Sociotypes

Typological integrity Socion 
Education of Young basis sociotypes

V. V. Gulenko , Kiev, 02. 04. 1993

Published: "Socionics, Mentology and Personality Psychology" , 1996, № 5.

1. Type as a combination of temperament and installation.

As it is known, four bipolar scales are necessary for the formation of 16 sociotypes. These scales were proposed by CG Jung in the work “Psychological Types” [1]. The significance of the fundamental signs of Jung is known to all socionics, but not everyone is able to apply them as a tool of social analysis.

The goal of this article is to help those who are seriously engaged in the socionic personality typology to understand the complex nature of socion and illuminate its structure from previously unknown projection points. Only in this way will we see socion in all its volume or hear its sound as harmonious harmonies of chords.

First of all, it is necessary to correctly identify the substructures existing in the socion - its organic segments - and grasp the dynamic link between them. Without complete consideration of the groups existing in it, it is impossible to comprehend this unit of society as a four-dimensional concept.

We will follow the path of building all possible projections of the socion on a plane and recreating its full structure by means of their unification. At the same time, I ask you not to forget that the completeness of which I speak in this article concerns only the so-called Jung basis - the four psychological scales opened by him.

It goes without saying that in addition to the usual set of oppositions "extra-introversion", "rationality and irrationality", "logic-ethics" and "sensory-intuition", there are many non-Yung-gov systems of differential features that describe a person not worse. But Jung, as a great systematizer, was and remains a historically chosen point of reference in the study of personality typology.

It is not difficult to verify that the Young basis allows us to construct six varieties of small groups of four types each. We will get this number if we use the combinatorial formula for the number of combinations of four scales (n) of two (k):

    kn! 1 * 2 * 3 * 4
C = ———— = ————————————— = 6.
    nk! (n - k)! 2 * 2

The most accessible to understanding of these six are two types of groups, namely, temperamental and installation groups. The reader will find their analysis in [5] and [6].

Here, let me just remind you that temperamental groups are formed by combining the “rational-irrationality” and “extraintroversion” scales , and the installation groups - the other two scales - “logic-ethics” and “sensory-intuition”.

In total, in a 16-type socion four generalized temperaments can be distinguished:

1. extrarational (conditionally choleric), which is characterized by directness and emotional incontinence in behavior,
2. Intrarational (conditionally phlegmatic), which includes the most consistent and evenly working types,
3. extra-rational (conditionally sanguine), which is characterized by liveliness and irresistible craving for the replacement of external impressions,
4. Intro-rational (conditionally melancholic), which is characterized by increased sensitivity and subtlety of internal experiences. In order not to confuse socionic temperaments with physiological temperaments, we will call them Energetic, Balanced, Flexible and Sensitive, respectively.

Installation groups differ in the direction of the four adjacent, but fundamentally different spheres of public life, where their natural potential manifests itself most effectively:

1. management installation (logical-sensory and sensory-logical) - management of the organization of material production, machines and mechanisms;
2. social setting (ethical-sensory and sensory-ethical) - social sphere of public life, including trade, supply, advertising, social security, service and leisure;
3. humanitarian setting (ethical-intuitive and intuitive-ethical) - culture and art, psychology, education, religion, ideology;
4. Scientist installation (logical-intuitive and intuitive-technological) - research and experiments, development of concepts and forecasts, knowledge of the laws of nature and society.

Each temperament can solve problems in any of the four large spheres of social life or, equivalently, each installation can be realized through any of the typical temperaments. At the same time, it is desirable to respect the proportions between all cells, otherwise a wave of intervention arises and the displacement of certain types from the sphere of action of their natural inclinations.

If the production worker is engaged in the development of scientific theories, and the humanities are taken to solve problems of social justice, etc., the result can only be deplorable: the society is “ill” with incompetence [7]. On the other hand, non-observance of the balance in the distribution of human resources between the four most important areas inevitably leads to overt or covert unemployment, and hence to an increase in social tensions.

The first, most simple and visual way to create a harmonious typology, demonstrates just the optimal distribution of the emotional and psychological energy of people in the main areas of application of forces in society. Here it is in tabular form:

Table 1 Formal structure of the socion

Setup / Temperament	Managers	Scientists	Socials	Humanities
Choleric	PS	PT	ES	ET
Phlegmatic	Lf	LI	RF	RI
Sanguine men	FL	IL	FR	IR
Melancholic	SP	TP	SE	TE

2. The perception of things and ideas.

One of the definitions of the mental process of perception, or perception, is this: “perception is a holistic reflection of objects, situations and events that occurs when physical stimuli directly affect the receptor surfaces of the senses” [3].

In socionics, perception is modeled by two perceiving functions — sensory and intuition. In the above definition, emphasis is placed on the sensory component, i.e. the real pole of this scale. What about perception of ideas?

Usually the idea is interpreted in psychology as a generalized image of reality. Is it possible directly, bypassing verbal-logical thinking, to perceive not specifically-sensory image, but immediately abstract, i.e. idea? If we answer yes - and we do it, because we take an intuitive-irrational perception as a fact - then we recognize the idea of ​​the right to an independent, although jointly with its material carrier, existence.

The definition of perception in traditional psychology, as we see, is rather one-sided. As a socionic, I cannot agree with the thesis that the ideal exists only in the human head and is necessarily mediated by the rational. It would follow from this that the four sociotypes — the intuitive irrationals — perceive only illusions.

Intuitive perception — the direct perception of ideas encoded in second-order and third-order derivatives of material processes — is the same fact of reality as the instantaneous sensations that arise when one's hands are feeling or looking at the surface of an object.Unfortunately, so far physiologists have paid little attention to the second, fundamentally different way of functioning of the sense organs.

But be that as it may, socio-analysis rejects the interpretation of an intuitive image as a derivative of the sensory one and considers both poles of the perceptual scale — sensory, giving a concrete reflection of reality, and intuition, reflecting what is behind objects and events — as equal in rights.

Sensors are involved in a particular tangible world, connected with it by thousands of tangible threads. They skillfully manipulate things (F) or subtly differentiate sensations from them (S). The details of the shape of objects or the relief of the visible picture of the event do not escape their attention.

Intuitives, on the contrary, are excluded from the totality of details, and are immersed in the world of abstract ideas and visions. They confidently handle the contents of things and events — information (I) or pick up their shadows — the visible projections of the contents onto some plane (T).

The definition of perception given at the beginning of this section emphasizes its inherent property of integrity. In the language of socionics, the requirement of irrationality is presented to perception. But again, based on the considerations of the completeness of the system, we cannot cross out the opposite pole of the scale - perception is incomplete, fractional (rational in terms of socionics) or to be credited as defective. Let us dwell on this dichotomy in more detail.

Irrationality is a parallel perception of the whole picture, forming a holistic view of it. In other words, the uniformity and simultaneity of reflection in the psyche of everything that affects the human senses.

Rationality is the perception of an external picture, part by part, in a certain fixed sequence, forming a dismembered (discrete) view of it. The reception of a set of signals affecting the senses is performed at different times, separated by micropauses.

And now on an example. Can you listen to a lecture for a long time (conversation, discussion, etc.) on one topic without being distracted? It depends on how interesting it is, you say. Suppose that is very interesting. Recall a few cases and draw conclusions.

Rationalists may concentrate on one thing for a long time if it is discretely constructed. A lecture, as well as verbal communication in general, is a sequence of separately following words and sentences with pauses between them, that is, a rational form. Therefore, the perception of a meaningful speech flow by rational types is stable and effective.

It is almost impossible for irrationals to perceive discrete speech without additional stimuli of the visual or kinesthetic analyzer. The natural perception mode for them is holistic. Being at a lecture in an informationally disadvantageous situation as compared to rationalists, they compensate for this integrity by means available to them - switching attention to another object, diverting to extraneous conversations, viewing the audience, etc. The most irrational extroverts violate discipline at lecture classes.

Conclusion. The mental process of the irrationals is built according to the scheme “I see, I hear.” Rationalists perceive and submit information using the inverse scheme “I hear, I see.” The first part of the formula indicates the input channel, the second - the representative system. The rational will not cause the desired picture in the head until it speaks an internal verbal command, and the irrational cannot properly conduct an internal dialogue until it visually presents the subject of discussion.

3. Perceptual groups.

Intersecting orthogonally, the socionic axes “sensory-intuition” and “rationality-irrationality” considered by us form four groups of perception. Here they are:

                 sensory
                     |
      DISTRIBUTIVE | COMMUTATIVE
                     |
ratio ———————————————— | ——————————————— irratio
                     |
      DISSOCIATIVE | ASSOCIATIVE
                     |
                  intuition

1. Sensory irrational, or commutative. These include the sociotypes COORDINATOR, POLITICIAN, MASTER, MEDIATOR. The perception in this group is extremely clear and concrete, distinguished by clarity and perceptibility - the closest to reality. When such a sociotype finds itself in a situation of uncertainty, it is guided by its past experience or comes from standard scenarios for the development of events.

The world for commutative sociotypes is a mosaic composition where each pebble can be moved (in this case, the picture changes, as in a kaleidoscope), but not thrown away. The perception of reality turns out to be somewhat flat, but detailed. In everyday terms, representatives of these sociotypes accumulate a lot of things, but they are poorly ordered.

Commutativity (displaceability) as the law of mathematical operations reflects precisely this property of this group:

a + b = b + a.

Commutative types are not afraid of inverted images. Apparently, therefore, they are well oriented on the ground, quickly finding familiar objects or stating their movement.

And one more note. The current trend in practical psychology - neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) is a concentrated expression of this particular perceptive group. The technique of NLP is actually based on the conscious switching of sensory channels.

2. Intuitive irrationals, or ASSOCIATIVE. This group includes sociotypes IL, IR, TP, TE. This type of perception is carried out through arbitrarily generated images. Some one detail of the perceived picture causes in these sociotypes a holistic ideal image, associated with all its content.

For Associative sociotypes, a system is not a hierarchical order according to any criterion, but a comprehensive network connection of everything with everything that has ever come into their field of vision. Thanks to their ability to catch spiderlike interrelations, these sociotypes well foresee or anticipate the future - the trends of events. They rely on the well-known principle of "dominoes": one knuckle fallen down pushes the other until the entire chain falls. Therefore, behaviorally, they are always ready for the most likely event.

As the reader was convinced, I am somewhat narrowing the meaning of the concept of "associativity", putting into it approximately the same content as J. Grinder and R. Bendler put into the concept of "anchoring" [4], i.e. it refers to the combination of stimulus reactions of any nature. Mathematically, associativity is written as a “bracketed” operation - an arbitrary combination of terms or factors:

(a + b) + c = a + (b + c).

The sociotypes of this group have a large number of diverse ideas, but these ideas are poorly ordered, freely flowing one into another.

3. Sensory rationals, or DISTRIBUTIVE. These include sociotypes PS, ES, LF, RF. They perceive unevenly, as if through some glasses of traditionalism - an orderly experience, putting some objects or states to the forefront and pushing others away, which become just a background.

Distributive psyche sets out ideas about the phenomena of the world in a certain order - it distributes them to the first, second, third, etc., depending on the depth of distribution. The first objects in such an ordered series are perceived clearly and concretely, the latter - as if they fall out of perception, few are taken into account.

Distributive sociotypes are harder to tolerate uncertainty (equiprobability of outcomes), since they lose their foothold - the ability to distribute forces and means for a specific goal. Therefore, they strive to move as quickly as possible to a steady state — either to return to the old or to be transported to the new.

These are the most organized and punctual members of society, strictly meeting the time schedule and technological discipline. By virtue of these qualities, by their share in a team or social stratum, one can assess its stability and adherence to traditions. The things with which they surround themselves are smaller than those of the Commutative, but they are contained in a greater order.

Mathematically, a distributional law can be written as a replacement of a product by a sum, i.e., as an operation “opening the brackets”:

a (b + c) = ab + ac.

The common factor “a” is evenly distributed among all the terms, symbolically expressing a strongly cultivated tradition. Distributors unwittingly pass everything that is again perceived through their past experience - they think through eidetic images.

4. Intuitive rationals, or DISSOCIATIVE. This perceptual group includes sociotypes PT, LI, ET, RI. They are reductionally perceiving types - refracting any information coming from outside through the prism of the basic concepts of their worldview. Their perception is mostly based on the reduction of the complex to the combination of primary elements, which Jung once called archetypes. Thus, dissociation is the decay into natural minimal parts. Of these komponenty Dissociative type can synthesize the image of any complexity.

In the state of uncertainty of the outcomes of any event, Dissociative types provide for actions for all possible variants of its development. They calmly await the future, after they prepare for the positive and negative outcomes of the expected event. Mathematically, the phenomenon of dissociation is similar to the operation “putting off the brackets” - replacing the addition with multiplication:

ab + ac + ad = a (b + c + d).

In terms of the number of ideas, Dissociatives are inferior to the Associative, but in terms of their orderliness and reduction to a conceptual or “ideological” state, they are superior.

Oddly enough, they can not reflect the external picture on your internal screen. They involuntarily decompose it, and then reassemble it, drawing imaginary images that do not have prototypes in reality.

4. Type as the union of perception with sociability.

In addition to the formal shell in society there is an informal core, which has no less impact on the life of society. I model this deep structure by intertwining the types of perception with the style of communication in an informal setting. I introduced you to perception in the previous section. The reader will find the study of communication skills in [8].

Let me remind you that interpersonal skills, by which I mean the familiar social-type communication style at close communicative distances, are manifested in four main varieties, namely:

1. group of passionate sociotypes (ethical extroverts), who are confident in their attitude to another person and are not afraid to openly show their likes and dislikes; the most sociable types in informal contacts;
2. a group of Cool-blooded sociotypes (logical introverts) who are not sure of their feelings and therefore are very restrained in emotional manifestations; the least sociable category of people;
3. a group of business sociotypes (logical extroverts) that are in contact in business communication and whose emotions are directed at the results of the work;
4. the group of Mental sociotypes (ethical introverts), which possess a hidden world of spiritual experiences and are distinguished by strong, although not demonstrated by outsiders, spiritual affections; they are characterized by an average degree of sociability - sociability among friends and relatives.

Perception and interpersonal skills determine the second way of forming sociotypes within the framework of the Jungian basis. It reflects the informal side of the functioning of the socion, arising from the perception of individuals and events, as well as the emotional attraction-repulsion between the participants of the communicative process.

The corresponding table looks like this:

Table 2 INFORMAL STRUCTURE OF SOCIO

Perception / Sociability	Commutative	Distributive	Associative	Dissociative
Passionate	FR	ES	IR	ET
Business	FL	PS	IL	PT
Soul	SE	RF	TE	RI
Cold blooded	SP	Lf	TP	LI

5. How conclusions are made.

A person is included in the information flow in two ways: as the recipient of information (the process of perception, or perception) and as the one issuing it (the process of reasoning, or argumentation). In the previous section, we were engaged in various types of perception. We now turn to the formation of judgments.

Based on the provisions of the American typological school [2], the process of perception prevails in irrational types - they reflect the world more adequately because of their flexibility. Rationalists, on the contrary, better reason and formulate conclusions than perceive the external situation. A firm point of view associated with strictly defined concepts and the sequence of its upholding is primarily characteristic of rational types.

It is also necessary to take into account the fact that mind-building (judgment) can be done not only logically, that is, formally and impartially, but also ethically, that is, emotionally colored, biased. Textbooks of logic about judgments usually state that this is one of the basic logical forms of cognition of reality. In this case, logic is understood as discreteness (dismemberment). In socionics, this category is called rationality.

Logic as a socionical concept is an extreme form of rationality. Such dismemberment, in which all its parts are in relation to producing a judgment in equal position. In other words, have the same value. Ethical rationality ascribes to the parts of the judgment a subjective weighting factor, as a result of which they become unequal. In speech, this is conveyed by a special intonation, with which desired and unwanted words are pronounced, as well as the use of epithets, expressive words and expressions.

The rational way of thinking, strictly speaking, is more natural, as it begins with perception and ends with a judgment about the perceived. It is based on the so-called theory of reflection.

The rational style of thinking, due to its initial discreteness, looks in the light of this theory to be artificial, machine-based. This is true, because the knowledge of rational types seems to be turned upside down: it begins with a judgment based on a priori (pre-experimental) concepts and only then goes on to perceive the already transformed reality. The angle of view (intention) precedes the direct reception of information, as it were, initially embedded in the type.

Excessive bias in rationality — an exceptional orientation toward logic — leads to narrow perceptions, narrow-mindedness, and prejudices. The inflection in the direction of irrationality - an exceptional focus on intuition creates randomness, promiscuity, speculativeness.Competition between these areas is psychologically justified only when they are not suppressive, but dialectically complement each other.

6. Argumentative groups in the socion.

Argumentative groups are formed by splitting a socion into four parts by two Jung axes - “rationality-irrationality” and “logic-ethics”. It is these socionic scales that are directly involved in the formation of judgments and argumentation of conclusions.

Schematically, it looks like this:

                  ration
                    |
         BUTTERS | DESIGNERS
                    |
ethics —————————————— |
                    |
          DIPLOMATS | RESTRUCTORS
                    |
                 irratio

I will analyze the resulting argumentation styles mainly by two indicators of judgment - its fullness and resilience. To do this, we take note that the structure of the judgment implies the presence of 1) the subject of the judgment (as judged), 2) the predicate (property attributed to the subject) and 3) the link between them.

Completeness of judgment means that the subject under consideration is explicitly or implicitly (in a pronounced or hidden form) all predicates within a given paradigm are attributed.

The stability of judgment is defined as the inadmissibility of attributing to a subject of judgment predicates of other paradigms that are not related in this context to the one under consideration.

1. Logical rationals, or DESIGNERS (sociotypes PS, LF, PT, LI). Differ both completeness and perseverance of judgment. Their reasoning is therefore the most constructive. The results of their judgments are drawn up in the form of conclusions as a kind of coherent logical structure, optimally suitable for functioning as the basis for a scientific theory, a set of laws, an organizational structure, technology, etc.

Constructors are very difficult to knock off the logical chain of verbal reasoning. They are free to navigate in the entire volume of the stated material, therefore they can begin its presentation practically from any point. The disadvantage of their style of argumentation is the ignoring of other paradigms, the desire to develop thought only within its own system of concepts.

2. Logical irrationals, or RESTRUCTORS (sociotypes FL, SP, IL, TP). Their judgments are complete, but unstable. Because of this, they have a tendency to the transformations and adaptations of logical systems, both material and ideal. Their argument will be called restructive. Not finding within the existing paradigm the means of solving problems of interest to them, the restructors borrow them from other paradigms. The results of judgments they draw up in the form of "defamations" - finding a way out of a vicious circle. For this reason, they are often distinguished by ingenuity and resourcefulness in logically seemingly hopeless situations.

The restructors are somewhat inferior to the Constructors in the sequence of arguments. In their speeches, continually there is a waste from the main topic that is unmotivated for the external listener. But the restructive argument is free from dogma and differs by wider erudition.

3. Ethical rationals, or BLUSTERS (sociotypes ES, RF, ET, RI). Characterized by endurance, but incomplete judgments. They monitor the observance of the perceived and enrolled by their reference group in the category of "correct" structures and paradigms, paying little attention to their narrowness and imperfection. Draw up the results of their judgments in the form of interpretations, that is, the establishment of correspondence between the newly perceived information and those or other laws of the cultivated paradigm.

The argument of the Supervisors is based on authorities, socially fixed norms, as well as the interpretation of the names of concepts - terms, therefore it can be called nominative (nominative). For this reason, their reasoning often boils down to an argument about whether it is correct to call this or that phenomenon by this name. The emotional side of the Arguments ’argument is distinguished by its particular stability, as well as an appeal to the interlocutor’s feelings. It is this group that is more likely than others to risk falling into epigonism or scholasticism.

4. Ethical irrationality, or diplomas (sociotypes FR, SE, IR, TE). For them, both instability and incompleteness of judgments are most characteristic. The logic of their reasoning is small and, understanding this, they are trying to fill it with descriptiveness, i.e., by reporting all the information they know about this topic. Due to this, they create their own ground for a diplomatic maneuver - the replacement of one system of concepts for another. From the side it seems that the person leaves from the answer, “gets out”.

A descriptive (descriptive) approach is to list all known definitions of the subject of a judgment from the most varied, even if logically and unconnected, paradigms and the presentation of the possibility to draw a conclusion to the listener himself. In this case, it is usually emphasized how difficult it is to reach an unambiguous conclusion. Diplomats are most concerned about accusations of intent to evade a clear answer. Their cognitive (cognitive) problem is the search for a criterion of truth, or at least the justification for using a particular paradigm.

7. Type as a combination of stimulus and argumentation.

In [6], I described the method of formation and the content of the so-called Stimulus groups, which must be attracted to model the transition between the formal and informal parts of the socion. The convergence or removal of both subsystems largely depends on the extent to which the motivational forces that change the trajectory of the social movement type are included. The 16 types of socion are divided into four groups of stimuli, the content of which I would formulate as follows:

1. incentive group The status by which sensory extroverts are motivated means the desire for power, influence, noticeable social position, authority among the largest possible circle of people;
2. welfare stimulus group, which motivates sensory introverts, is expressed in good material support, comfortable living conditions, guarantees of a stable future;
3. stimulus group The uniqueness, which includes intuitive extroverts, includes new unusual beginnings, fundamental discoveries and inventions in any field, the ability to be a pioneer, to spread non-traditional teachings and life forms;
4. incentive group Self-worth, involving in the productive activities of intuitive introverts, includes personal curiosity, deep internal interest in the subject or methods of work, positive subjective assessment of the problem being solved.

The action of Stimuli creates a natural vertical stratification of society, when sensory extroverts, inexorably led by a powerful stimulus of the Status, break up to the top, and intuitive introverts that are poorly adapted to the struggle of life, whose self-value power is very low, roll downward.

Summing up the information on the stimuli that drive the types and their methods of argumentation, we will once again construct a 16-type socion as a combination of the type belonging, on the one hand, to one of the stimulus groups, and, on the other, to one of the argumentation groups.

This will be the third and last way to form sociotypes within the Jungian basis. It demonstrates the transition from the formal to the informal structure and vice versa, i.e. the interference between them. The table takes the following form:

Table 3 STRUCTURE OF THE SOCION INTERFERENCE

Stimulus / Argumentation	Status	Blessing	Uniqueness	Self worth
Constructors	PS	Lf	PT	LI
Restructors	FL	SP	IL	TP
Guardians	ES	RF	ET	RI
Diplomats	FR	ES	IR	TE

8. Typology from all sides.

Having three different objective projections of the socion on the plane, you just have to add a fourth one - your own, subjective, current view of it, and at the same moment you will have a holistic, three-dimensional picture of the subject of this article:

             Formal structure
                     |
                     | 
Your view - - - <С О Ц И О Н> --- Interference - - - - - -----------
                     |
                     |
            Informal structure

It is this technique, reminiscent of the synthesis of a holographic image, that we achieve the completeness of a typology - we get the opportunity to operate with socion as a four-dimensional information unit. More simple approaches should be recognized only as pre-participation. Exhausting the potential of the Jung scales, for each sociotype I am giving you a layout of six secondary complex features, in each of which two basic ones merge. With their help, the sociotype is integrated into a single socion cell of the social organism.

SUMMARY TYPOLOGY TABLE BY JUNG BASE (start)

SOCIOTYPE	Temperment	Installation	Perception
1. THE INVENTOR	Flexible	Scientist	Associative
2. INTERMEDIARY	Sensitive	Social	Commutative
3. Enthusiasts	Assertive	Social	Distributive
4. ANALYST	Balanced	Scientist	Dissociative
5. MENTOR	Assertive	Humanities	Dissociative
6. INSPECTOR	Balanced	Manager	Distributive
7. MARSHAL	Flexible	Manager	Commutative
8. LYRIC	Sensitive	Humanities	Associative
9. ENTREPRENEUR	Assertive	Scientist	Dissociative
10. KEEPER	Balanced	Social	Distributive
11. POLICY	Flexible	Social	Commutative
12. CRITIQUE	Sensory	Scientist	Associative
13. MANAGER	Assertive	Manager	Distributive
14. HUMANIST	Balanced	Humanities	Dissociative
15. COUNSELOR	Flexible	Humanities	Associative
16. MASTER	Sensory	Manager	Commutative

SUMMARY OF TYPOLOGY BY JUNG BASIS (continued)

SOCIOTYPE	Sociability	Stimulus	Argument
1. THE INVENTOR	Business	Uniqueness	Restructor
2. INTERMEDIARY	Soulful	Welfare	Diplomat
3. Enthusiasts	Passionate	Status	Guardian
4. ANALYST	Cold blooded	Self worth	Constructor
5. MENTOR	Passionate	Uniqueness	Guardian
6. INSPECTOR	Cold blooded	Welfare	Constructor
7. MARSHAL	Business	Status	Restructor
8. LYRIC	Soulful	Self worth	Diplomat
9. ENTREPRENEUR	Business	Uniqueness	Constructor
10. KEEPER	Soulful	Welfare	Guardian
11. POLICY	Passionate	Status	Diplomat
12. CRITIQUE	Cold blooded	Self worth	Restructor
13. MANAGER	Business	Status	Constructor
14. HUMANIST	Soulful	Self worth	Guardian
15. COUNSELOR	Passionate	Uniqueness	Diplomat
16. MASTER	Cold blooded	Welfare	Restructor

Socion I would like to compare with a living breathing organism. Informal and formal parts of it carry opposite signs. It is known that when the signs of the charges do not coincide, the bodies are attracted. In the same way, to pursue each other and the two structures of the socion, seeking to merge.

After combining the charge is destroyed and a single structure becomes neutral. But under the influence of the same conditions, a new charge is accumulating, but already of the same sign, as is the case with amber, rubbed with wool. As a result, repulsive forces are growing.

Spreading in different directions, both structures fall into different conditions, one of them is recharged and they are again attracted to each other by gravity. Everything repeats at first, as if the heart is beating: systole is replaced by diastole. This is how the single eternal rhythm of natural and social organisms manifests itself.

Literature

1. Jung K. G. Psychological types . M., Alphabet, 1992.
2. David Keirsey, Marilyn Bates. Please Understand Me . Character & Temperament Types. Gnosology Books Ltd., 1984.
3. Psychology. Vocabulary. Under total ed. A. V. Petrovsky, M. G. Yaroshevsky. M .: Politizdat, 1990, p. 66
4. Bandler R., Grinder J. From frogs to princes.
5. Gulenko V.V. Sociotypes in communication. K., January 1992.
6. Gulenko V.V. Guarantees of productive learning. Temperamental and stimulus groups - Kiev, June 13, 1992 // SM & CP, 1996, No. 6.
7. V. Gulenko. Reciprocity Criteria: Intertype Relationships as Interaction of Temperaments and Attitudes . - Kiev, 15.07.1992 // SMEPL, 1996, № 2.
8. Gulenko V. Century. Vital scenarios - from ethical feelings to sensory inclinations - Kiev, 2.12.1992 // SMPL, 1996, № 1.