Identity Relationship

ILE-ILE
ESE-ESE
SEI-SEI
LII-LII
EIE-EIE
SLE-SLE
LSI-LSI
IEI-IEI
SEE-SEE
LIE-LIE
ILI-ILI
ESI-ESI
LSE-LSE
IEE-IEE
EII-EII
SLI-SLI

---

These is a lot of understanding between identical partners, but also an inability to truly help one another. Seeing this, identical partners are likely to develop a sense of sympathy for each other. You want to support or justify your partner in any way, since you feel that in this situation you would have done the same. On the other hand, communication quickly gets boring. Not receiving new information from the partner, you see the futility of such relations. Uninformative partner seems boring and dull. Over time, relations become either neutral or cool. This is not surprising, because after the exchange of information it is not interesting to keep up a conversation, knowing well in advance that you could reach the same conclusions. One exception to this is if there is very large difference in the experience or knowledge. Then there may be great interest and attraction towards each other. Such relationships are ideal for teacher-student type of interaction. Collaboration in this case is also effective, as it adds two forces in same direction. Communication between overlapping subtypes is much more pleasant and easy. With mismatched subtypes partners perceive each other with some suspicion; it seems that the other person is somehow misdirected. Identical relations are of great educational value, because they allow a person to look at himself or herself more objectively and evaluate own strengths and weaknesses. And taking a look at ourselves is not always pleasant. Even own voice recorded on tape seems not so much worse than one thought. These relationships help to develop proper self-estimation.

---


Advice on getting along: These relations require constant influx of new varied information that can be discussed. During the discussion, there is a tendency to engage in intellectual debates, trying to prove one's intellectual superiority. Therefore, try to go out more often, socialize, visit the theater, museums, parks, or simply even take walks in populated places.

Divide household responsibilities and don't stress anyone's priority. Keep in mind that identical relations will never provide what partners expect of out of them, so be prepared for disappointments and adjustments to plans to make them more realistic. The less pleasant side of these relations is that there is an ongoing uncertainty with regard to one's partner. As soon as such doubts arise, set aside your emotions and rationally try to figure out what's wrong. Without understanding of the general pattern of partner's behavior, an explanation of the particulars briefly stabilizes these relations. Don't let arrogance take over these relations. Try to communicate democratically, with a sense of humor.

---

Research Relations: Their goal – to learn more about the world, its fundamental laws, and about oneself through comparison with others. Within these types of relations, ability to make comparisons, analyses, classifications, and to put forward advanced hypothesis improves markedly.. Research relations train one's mental functions. I use term "mental" here not in the sense of "belonging to the mental processes" but in reference to the mental 1, 2, 7 and 8 functional positions in socionics model.

Research relations serve as foundation for "young" partnerships i.e. psychologically immature ones. Many young people enter unions based on shared interests - music, hobbies, common conversation topics. Despite the fact that sometimes such relations are very stable, it is similar to an experiment to create a family.


Identity (Heavy Research) – In these relations, people are attracted by similarity in interests. However, after understanding one another, these relations become uninteresting. Identity starts from sense of mutual understanding and evolves to competition in the intellectual sphere. Discussions involve most unique and controversial issues.

---

Accelerating-Decelerating Relations: This type of relations is characterized by unavoidable oscillations in energy from positive (acceleration) to negative (deceleration). In such dyad, there is build-up of energy during the first phase of interaction and subsequent increase in resistance in the second half. Another name for such relations is relations of resonance, since they transpire smoothly if one partner is able to adjust to the other partner's rhythm of life. However, it is not possible to hold this resonance for long periods of time - now and then there are breaks and misunderstandings. The main recommendation is to engage in negotiations and to seek recovery of the lost balance by way of making mutual concessions. It should be noted that the general nature of relations will be influenced by characteristic of rationality / irrationality. For example, business relations as a whole are better formed in a rational dyad, as in such a dyad one partner will be ethical type and another logical type. Kindred relations for the same reason are better formed within irrational dyad. If both partners are ethical or logical such distribution does not give complementarity in psychological sense.

Identity - energy oscillations are in-phase due to similar temperaments. Because of this, one quickly understands both strengths and weaknesses of the partner. Deterioration of relations occurs when partners attempt to solve problems where both experience same difficulties.

Flexible-Agile Relations: This temperamental group includes relations: Superego, Identity, Business, Related. Represent the opposite of equilibrium relationships. They arise with the similarity of temperaments of interacting sociotypes. Partners acquire flexibility in behavior, rapid switching from one mode of action to another. The key word for them is RESONANCE. Resonance in Latin means an echo, echo. In order for the buildup to occur, the partners must forcibly synchronize the “natural frequencies”, as if “sound” one inside the other.

Identity - mental resonance. The desire to get ahead of a partner, to prove that you are smarter. One kind of "lights" the other. The winner in this intellectual battle is one or the other alternately. There is no fixed leadership.

---

Monotonous Discussions: Communication is productive only at different levels of knowledge. In this case, an interesting discussion starts up. When identicals are on equal intellectual levels, debate becomes protracted and quickly gets tiring. With some pleasure you try to break the monotony of these relations by encouraging your partner to take actions that are uncharacteristic for his temperament. There is usually good understanding but no deep interest in each other. If you do not disturb the balance artificially, you will not avoid subsequent clash of interests.

---

Identity (Irrational Relation): Partners intuitively understand each other's motives and oppose any attempt to normalize their behavior, to subordinate their freedom to any restrictions, however fair. Identical pair is extremely democratic and violates all frameworks and traditions.

Identity (Logical Relation): Identity relations quickly manifest their cold nature. Identical types easily calculate the logic of each other's behavior and therefore quickly lose mutual interest. They show a tendency towards intellectualization - the importance of cognitive interests and intellectual discussions.

Identity (Intuitive Relation): Identical pair combines similar outlook on life, often adopts the same side on issues, shares in hobbies and interests. Plans that identical partners create together are colorful and promising, but have little chance to get implemented as they intended.

Identity (Static Relation): Identical relations quickly grow boring and monotonous due to similarity of temperament and understandable ways of the partner. Basic human passions rarely change throughout life. And if such changes occur, their causes and meaning, are easily understood. It becomes more difficult to dispel the dullness of these relations.

Identity (Evolutionary Relation): Identical partners are so much alike in their preferences, that as a couple they adapt to each other even more. This similarity is initially attracts. They strive to achieve even greater understanding and in pursuit of this process will eventually lose the outcome. Their socionics aspects are summed up and the contribution of each thus becomes indistinguishable.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SHS Subtypes Reference 2022

Psychosophy Clubs and Sextas

My General Understanding of Psychosophy