Reverse Revision Relation (Supervisee)
Revision rings
ILE -> EII
ESE -> IEI
SEI -> LSE
LII -> SLE
EIE -> SEI
SLE -> ESI
LSI -> ILE
IEI -> LIE
SEE -> LSI
LIE -> SLI
ILI -> EIE
ESI -> IEE
LSE -> ILI
IEE -> LII
EII -> SEE
SLI -> ESE
The criterion for the sweep of revision rings is to take a chain of quadras, the turnover of which has long been investigated. The alpha quadra has the greatest strategic innovation potential, it is replaced by a more narrowly focused but much better organized quadra beta, then the current gamma follows and the most conservative delta quadrant completes the baton.
Now we build the sweep:
Right statics: IL, LF, FR, RI. The inspector provides movement from the goal setting by the Seeker to the goal-setting by the Politician, while the Humanist stabilizes the functioning of the whole ring.
Left statics: LI, FL, RF, IR. The Marshal directs the unforgiving Analyst and the Keeper, and the Advisor corrects the Analyst to record the results of the Keeper.
Right dynamics: SE, ET, TP, PS. The mentor connects the opposites Mediator - Critic, and the Administrator gives feedback to the group.
Left dynamics: ES, TE, PT, SP. The lyric coordinates the Enthusiast and the Entrepreneur, and the Master ensures the self-preservation of the whole four as a whole.
In the left rings - the second and fourth, carrying out the renewal of society, the direction of information is opposite to the right rings, which stabilize development. In the left rings a reverse revision plays a much larger role. For example, the Marshal will rather try to change the behavior of the Guardian, rather than the Analyst. The analyst will have less influence on the Advisor than on the Marshal, etc.
---
This is a second type of asymmetric relations in the socion. Auditor as if constantly monitors revisee, drawing attention to his weak spot. The impression is that the auditor constantly wants to figure out what revisee is doing and how he is doing it. Revisee often gets the impression that he is being watched all the time alike a guinea pig. However, this does not mean that the auditor always verbally points out perceived shortcomings of revisee. Revisee internally feels that the auditor can do so at any time and, therefore, initially in his presence revisee exists in a state of tension. Auditor seems like a significant person; how he acts deserves attention. Revisee wants to earn recognition of the auditor, his praise is much appreciated.
However, the auditor always underestimates the revisee, and perceives his thoughts and actions as insignificant, which incites resentment in revisee. At first, revisee may be encouraged by this and want to prove his usefulness to the auditor, but all attempts are unsuccessful. Auditor seems smug and petty, he finds faults, tries to teach and re-educate the revisee. Revisee seems interesting and capable, but he is missing something. He requires help and suggestions, but all advice proves useless. Revisee does not accept them, which further increases the desire of auditor to re-audit. Revisee seems stupid not because he is unable (which is how it actually is), but simply because it's as if he does not want to listen. This periodically causes frustration for the auditor. These relations may be re-named to "guardianship" of auditor over the audited, which can be very annoying for the later. Sensing his vulnerability, revisee is inclined to make attempts to escape this control, especially around other people: he one-ups the auditor, tries to argue with him, gives him orders. However, such attempts are fruitless. Auditor, as a rule, does not take offense but continues with his re-education attempts. These relationships are well illustrated by an analogy "mother-naughty child". [translator's note: see also Pygmalion project]
Supervision couple sometimes is very tightly knit. This is because both people can feel their social significance: the auditor as guardian and benefactor, without whose care and guidance the audited would be lost, and audited - as the object of care, whose value is recognized in this way. In relations of benefit, this feeling is much less expressed, because the benefactor does not make attempts to re-educate his beneficiary.
---
Advice on getting along: These relations can progress in two ways. If the auditor is more active and the audited is subordinate to him, then they assume an instructive, educational character. If the audited is resisting the auditor, then relations assume the character of criticism and control.
These relations are stable only if interactions are calm and balanced. Avoid surprises, jointly plan your day, warn each other about any changes in your plans. Any problems should be clarified directly and in private, without eruptions of emotions.
The auditor must patiently relay the information to the audited, so that the audited can calmly analyze it and make conclusions. If the audited refers to the auditor with his personal problems, the auditor should graciously comfort him and justify his behavior in difficult situations. The auditor should try to defend him against outside attacks, take care of him, to help him build relationships in the sphere where the auditor is influential.
Take into account the critical attitude towards each other. The audited criticizes the auditor not as a whole, but his specific action, while forgiving him as a whole. The auditor, to the contrary, forgives the audited specific flaws and actions, but criticizes his position or beliefs as a whole.
---
Working relations: This group includes Semi-duality, Direct Request (benefit), Business (look-alike), and Reverse Supervision. Working relations create productive teams of co-workers and collaborators who share a common pragmatic goal and skillfully distribute responsibilities and assignments. Communication in these relations puts a load on instrumental functions - 2, 3, 5, 8 positions. Types of families that get founded on basis of these relationships – colleagues at work, promoters of a common cause. For such pair prenuptial contract is suitable – when relations between spouses are regulated by a marriage contract or any other form of formal consolidation of mutual obligations. Emotions in the working relationship must be kept on a sound logic "leash."
Reverse supervision (Heavy Working) – Audit, control, inventorization. Promotes actualization of monotone, uninteresting, wearisome work which is nevertheless required.
---
Decelerating Relations: These relations are opposite in their energetics to relations of acceleration. The total energy potential of such dyad falls over time, simultaneously there is deepening of informational connections between partners. The advantage of these relations is thus not in activity, but in high-quality, comprehensive treatment of mutually useful or interesting information. The main recommendation is to use these relations for self-improvement and personal growth.
Reverse supervision - one-sided deceleration directed in the opposite direction from supervisee to supervisor. Represents attempt of supervisee to break from control of supervisor. Favorable development of relations implies not return, but transfer of received information (not energy!) further down the supervision chain.
Balanced-Stable Relations: Relations have such temperament: Conflict, Mirror, Direct revision, Reverse audit. They are opposite in their temperamental effect to linear-energetic relations - they have an inhibitory and retarding effect on the dyad. These relationships take energy, but stimulate information processes. The key word conveying their meaning is BRAKING.
Reverse audit - working braking directed from the auditor to the auditor. This process usually results in intrusive control and nagging at small things, forcing the auditor to stop, cool down, and work slower and more thoroughly.
---
Disorienting intervention: Partner is very appealing to their way of thinking and style of behavior. From him comes information that is interesting and valuable to you, but it seems incomplete and in need of clarification. When you relay your corrections to the partner, a dispute usually starts, as a result of which your criticisms will be taken into consideration, though not immediately. If the partner is trying to shamelessly impose their opinion on you, the relations can come to an end. However, if relations have been established, partner develops a habit to contact you for advice on matters in which you have demonstrated your competence.
The reader, perhaps, is surprised to see new types of intertype relations - reverse order [benefit] and reverse supervision. Two reasons substantiate their existence. First, there should be sixteen types of intertype relations, not fourteen as with Aushra (order-contract as audit-report are two sides of the same relation). Second, as was demonstrated in practice, in Involutionary rings of socioprogress the rules are inverse, making benefit and supervision in Result/Involutionary and Process/Evolutionary rings be different types of relations [Right/Left]. If Process/Evolutionary supervision consists of suppression of any deviations, then Result/Involutionary supervision is demand for more precise formulations and additions. [More information on Process/ Result dichotomy can be found in this article.]
Reverse Revision (Introverted Relation): Balance is achieved only if the influence from outside world is limited. It is only then that the educational effect, the impact of auditor on internal world of the audited to change it, can be achieved. Intervention from outside makes these relations simply intolerable.
Reverse Revision (Rational Relation): In a well-functioning audit pair, neither the auditor nor the audited make any sudden, unpredictable actions that can annul mutual agreements. Opposite behavior is very destructive as it leads to mutual distrust. Relations of revision promote discussions of issues over which there has been disagreement, otherwise there is internal accumulation of problems. When the problem is felt but ignored, this is the first sign of a future outbreak of emotions.
Reverse Revision (Logical Relation): Revision-minus strengthens the logical direction of thinking: revisee seeks to control the logic of behavior of the auditor. All illogical statements and actions do not slip by his attention. Revisee may feel the need to expose inconsistencies of the auditor, to identify errors in his reasoning.
Reverse Revision (Sensing Relation): Revision-minus intensifies attentiveness and thoroughness. Revisee pays a lot of attention to the details in the behavior of his auditor, watches his almost every step, collects accurate information about him. This revision disciplines a person, but at the same time narrows his view.
Reverse Revision (Static Relation): Revision is a process of painful jumps from one stable state to another. Auditor is constantly imposing the same system of values and behaviors on the audited, while the latter stubbornly resists. The ways he counters the auditor remain virtually unchanged: finding faults and mistakes in his judgments and actions. These relations require maximum tolerance and humanity towards one another.
Reverse Revision (Evolutionary Relation): The auditor acting on and influencing the audited person, molds his inner world to his own image. The audited while highly (albeit critically) valuing the auditor seeks to attain similar inner qualities as him. In the process of mutual control partners hone out an acceptable pattern of behavior. Tensions of supervision relations reach a high point, waver for a while, and then markedly diminish, which is indicative that relations have entered the final phase - completed their educational mission and lost their energy saturation.
ILE -> EII
ESE -> IEI
SEI -> LSE
LII -> SLE
EIE -> SEI
SLE -> ESI
LSI -> ILE
IEI -> LIE
SEE -> LSI
LIE -> SLI
ILI -> EIE
ESI -> IEE
LSE -> ILI
IEE -> LII
EII -> SEE
SLI -> ESE
The criterion for the sweep of revision rings is to take a chain of quadras, the turnover of which has long been investigated. The alpha quadra has the greatest strategic innovation potential, it is replaced by a more narrowly focused but much better organized quadra beta, then the current gamma follows and the most conservative delta quadrant completes the baton.
Now we build the sweep:
Right statics: IL, LF, FR, RI. The inspector provides movement from the goal setting by the Seeker to the goal-setting by the Politician, while the Humanist stabilizes the functioning of the whole ring.
Left statics: LI, FL, RF, IR. The Marshal directs the unforgiving Analyst and the Keeper, and the Advisor corrects the Analyst to record the results of the Keeper.
Right dynamics: SE, ET, TP, PS. The mentor connects the opposites Mediator - Critic, and the Administrator gives feedback to the group.
Left dynamics: ES, TE, PT, SP. The lyric coordinates the Enthusiast and the Entrepreneur, and the Master ensures the self-preservation of the whole four as a whole.
In the left rings - the second and fourth, carrying out the renewal of society, the direction of information is opposite to the right rings, which stabilize development. In the left rings a reverse revision plays a much larger role. For example, the Marshal will rather try to change the behavior of the Guardian, rather than the Analyst. The analyst will have less influence on the Advisor than on the Marshal, etc.
---
This is a second type of asymmetric relations in the socion. Auditor as if constantly monitors revisee, drawing attention to his weak spot. The impression is that the auditor constantly wants to figure out what revisee is doing and how he is doing it. Revisee often gets the impression that he is being watched all the time alike a guinea pig. However, this does not mean that the auditor always verbally points out perceived shortcomings of revisee. Revisee internally feels that the auditor can do so at any time and, therefore, initially in his presence revisee exists in a state of tension. Auditor seems like a significant person; how he acts deserves attention. Revisee wants to earn recognition of the auditor, his praise is much appreciated.
However, the auditor always underestimates the revisee, and perceives his thoughts and actions as insignificant, which incites resentment in revisee. At first, revisee may be encouraged by this and want to prove his usefulness to the auditor, but all attempts are unsuccessful. Auditor seems smug and petty, he finds faults, tries to teach and re-educate the revisee. Revisee seems interesting and capable, but he is missing something. He requires help and suggestions, but all advice proves useless. Revisee does not accept them, which further increases the desire of auditor to re-audit. Revisee seems stupid not because he is unable (which is how it actually is), but simply because it's as if he does not want to listen. This periodically causes frustration for the auditor. These relations may be re-named to "guardianship" of auditor over the audited, which can be very annoying for the later. Sensing his vulnerability, revisee is inclined to make attempts to escape this control, especially around other people: he one-ups the auditor, tries to argue with him, gives him orders. However, such attempts are fruitless. Auditor, as a rule, does not take offense but continues with his re-education attempts. These relationships are well illustrated by an analogy "mother-naughty child". [translator's note: see also Pygmalion project]
Supervision couple sometimes is very tightly knit. This is because both people can feel their social significance: the auditor as guardian and benefactor, without whose care and guidance the audited would be lost, and audited - as the object of care, whose value is recognized in this way. In relations of benefit, this feeling is much less expressed, because the benefactor does not make attempts to re-educate his beneficiary.
---
Advice on getting along: These relations can progress in two ways. If the auditor is more active and the audited is subordinate to him, then they assume an instructive, educational character. If the audited is resisting the auditor, then relations assume the character of criticism and control.
These relations are stable only if interactions are calm and balanced. Avoid surprises, jointly plan your day, warn each other about any changes in your plans. Any problems should be clarified directly and in private, without eruptions of emotions.
The auditor must patiently relay the information to the audited, so that the audited can calmly analyze it and make conclusions. If the audited refers to the auditor with his personal problems, the auditor should graciously comfort him and justify his behavior in difficult situations. The auditor should try to defend him against outside attacks, take care of him, to help him build relationships in the sphere where the auditor is influential.
Take into account the critical attitude towards each other. The audited criticizes the auditor not as a whole, but his specific action, while forgiving him as a whole. The auditor, to the contrary, forgives the audited specific flaws and actions, but criticizes his position or beliefs as a whole.
---
Working relations: This group includes Semi-duality, Direct Request (benefit), Business (look-alike), and Reverse Supervision. Working relations create productive teams of co-workers and collaborators who share a common pragmatic goal and skillfully distribute responsibilities and assignments. Communication in these relations puts a load on instrumental functions - 2, 3, 5, 8 positions. Types of families that get founded on basis of these relationships – colleagues at work, promoters of a common cause. For such pair prenuptial contract is suitable – when relations between spouses are regulated by a marriage contract or any other form of formal consolidation of mutual obligations. Emotions in the working relationship must be kept on a sound logic "leash."
Reverse supervision (Heavy Working) – Audit, control, inventorization. Promotes actualization of monotone, uninteresting, wearisome work which is nevertheless required.
---
Decelerating Relations: These relations are opposite in their energetics to relations of acceleration. The total energy potential of such dyad falls over time, simultaneously there is deepening of informational connections between partners. The advantage of these relations is thus not in activity, but in high-quality, comprehensive treatment of mutually useful or interesting information. The main recommendation is to use these relations for self-improvement and personal growth.
Reverse supervision - one-sided deceleration directed in the opposite direction from supervisee to supervisor. Represents attempt of supervisee to break from control of supervisor. Favorable development of relations implies not return, but transfer of received information (not energy!) further down the supervision chain.
Balanced-Stable Relations: Relations have such temperament: Conflict, Mirror, Direct revision, Reverse audit. They are opposite in their temperamental effect to linear-energetic relations - they have an inhibitory and retarding effect on the dyad. These relationships take energy, but stimulate information processes. The key word conveying their meaning is BRAKING.
Reverse audit - working braking directed from the auditor to the auditor. This process usually results in intrusive control and nagging at small things, forcing the auditor to stop, cool down, and work slower and more thoroughly.
---
Disorienting intervention: Partner is very appealing to their way of thinking and style of behavior. From him comes information that is interesting and valuable to you, but it seems incomplete and in need of clarification. When you relay your corrections to the partner, a dispute usually starts, as a result of which your criticisms will be taken into consideration, though not immediately. If the partner is trying to shamelessly impose their opinion on you, the relations can come to an end. However, if relations have been established, partner develops a habit to contact you for advice on matters in which you have demonstrated your competence.
The reader, perhaps, is surprised to see new types of intertype relations - reverse order [benefit] and reverse supervision. Two reasons substantiate their existence. First, there should be sixteen types of intertype relations, not fourteen as with Aushra (order-contract as audit-report are two sides of the same relation). Second, as was demonstrated in practice, in Involutionary rings of socioprogress the rules are inverse, making benefit and supervision in Result/Involutionary and Process/Evolutionary rings be different types of relations [Right/Left]. If Process/Evolutionary supervision consists of suppression of any deviations, then Result/Involutionary supervision is demand for more precise formulations and additions. [More information on Process/ Result dichotomy can be found in this article.]
---
Reverse Revision (Introverted Relation): Balance is achieved only if the influence from outside world is limited. It is only then that the educational effect, the impact of auditor on internal world of the audited to change it, can be achieved. Intervention from outside makes these relations simply intolerable.
Reverse Revision (Rational Relation): In a well-functioning audit pair, neither the auditor nor the audited make any sudden, unpredictable actions that can annul mutual agreements. Opposite behavior is very destructive as it leads to mutual distrust. Relations of revision promote discussions of issues over which there has been disagreement, otherwise there is internal accumulation of problems. When the problem is felt but ignored, this is the first sign of a future outbreak of emotions.
Reverse Revision (Logical Relation): Revision-minus strengthens the logical direction of thinking: revisee seeks to control the logic of behavior of the auditor. All illogical statements and actions do not slip by his attention. Revisee may feel the need to expose inconsistencies of the auditor, to identify errors in his reasoning.
Reverse Revision (Sensing Relation): Revision-minus intensifies attentiveness and thoroughness. Revisee pays a lot of attention to the details in the behavior of his auditor, watches his almost every step, collects accurate information about him. This revision disciplines a person, but at the same time narrows his view.
Reverse Revision (Static Relation): Revision is a process of painful jumps from one stable state to another. Auditor is constantly imposing the same system of values and behaviors on the audited, while the latter stubbornly resists. The ways he counters the auditor remain virtually unchanged: finding faults and mistakes in his judgments and actions. These relations require maximum tolerance and humanity towards one another.
Reverse Revision (Evolutionary Relation): The auditor acting on and influencing the audited person, molds his inner world to his own image. The audited while highly (albeit critically) valuing the auditor seeks to attain similar inner qualities as him. In the process of mutual control partners hone out an acceptable pattern of behavior. Tensions of supervision relations reach a high point, waver for a while, and then markedly diminish, which is indicative that relations have entered the final phase - completed their educational mission and lost their energy saturation.
Comments
Post a Comment