Business Relationship

ILE-SLE
ESE-LSE
SEI-IEI
LII-EII
EIE-LIE
LSI-ESI
SEE-IEE
ILI-SLI

---

These are relations of equal partners. It is more accurate to call this type of relations a partnership rather than a friendship. There are few barriers in communication here. Partners can tell each other anything. There is a certain sense of safety in these relations: each partner feels that the other doesn't pose a threat. And this is a very welcome feeling, especially if the person is used to a more hostile environment. In addition, these relations make roles that the partners play in society more prominent. Due to this, there is an opportunity to play "cat and mouse" with each other: intentionally alternating pressure and relief during conversation. In such conversations one partner always has an advantage over the other, depending on the theme or topic of a particular conversation. Within these relations partners may successfully cooperate in business. However, this is effective only with matching subtypes - otherwise verbal fun can turn into excessive pressure. This pressure always comes from a strong function of the partner and is perceived as a bolt of lightning from a clear sky, but major disagreements are rare. Typically, partners try to help one another. In any case, the request for assistance by one partner is perceived correctly by the other, however, help is not intensive. In summary, we can say that these relationships have an average degree of comfort. One doesn't have anything against such a partner, but at the same time nothing for his or her either. There is a sense of having a reasonable minimum, which reflects the satisfaction of communicating with an equal and not boring partner.

---

Advice on getting along:  Since these relations lead to competition and power struggles, to avoid this, one partner must recognize the other as the stronger or a more experienced person, as the leader. Discuss the logic of your future actions, but perform what has been conceived separately as agreed. Otherwise, major friction may arise as well as the desire to impose your methods of action.

Discuss the results of your work with your partner, analyze how your day has went, otherwise mistrust and suspicion may arise. Allegation of being unethical are forwarded. There may be a desire to annoy one another. Since these relations are of logical-managerial nature, and conflicts of interest are inevitable, do not attempt to sort things out, especially alone. In the event of a conflict try to separate and understand what had happened. Switch to a different type of activity. In this case, the leading partner should demonstrate good attitude towards the one who has taken the back seat, or at least show that nothing has happened.

---


Working relations:  This group includes Semi-duality, Direct Request (benefit), Business (look-alike), and Reverse Supervision. Working relations create productive teams of co-workers and collaborators who share a common pragmatic goal and skillfully distribute responsibilities and assignments. Communication in these relations puts a load on instrumental functions - 2, 3, 5, 8 positions. Types of families that get founded on basis of these relationships – colleagues at work, promoters of a common cause. For such pair prenuptial contract is suitable – when relations between spouses are regulated by a marriage contract or any other form of formal consolidation of mutual obligations. Emotions in the working relationship must be kept on a sound logic "leash."

Business (Heavy Working): Competition in power, breakthroughs, extreme situations. Certain edginess is an essential attribute in harsh working conditions. These relations train the "fighting", offensive qualities of partners.

---

Accelerating-Decelerating Relations: This type of relations is characterized by unavoidable oscillations in energy from positive (acceleration) to negative (deceleration). In such dyad, there is build-up of energy during the first phase of interaction and subsequent increase in resistance in the second half. Another name for such relations is relations of resonance, since they transpire smoothly if one partner is able to adjust to the other partner's rhythm of life. However, it is not possible to hold this resonance for long periods of time - now and then there are breaks and misunderstandings. The main recommendation is to engage in negotiations and to seek recovery of the lost balance by way of making mutual concessions.  It should be noted that the general nature of relations will be influenced by characteristic of rationality / irrationality. For example, business relations as a whole are better formed in a rational dyad, as in such a dyad one partner will be ethical type and another logical type. Kindred relations for the same reason are better formed within irrational dyad. If both partners are ethical or logical such distribution does not give complementarity in psychological sense.

Business (look-alike) - oscillations run ahead by quarter period. These relations represent the transition from superego to identity relations. These relations can pleasantly surprise you. That which seems unattainable to you, your partner performs a short period of time or on a larger scale than was expected.

Flexible-Agile Relations: This temperamental group includes relations: Superego, Identity, Business, Related. Represent the opposite of equilibrium relationships. They arise with the similarity of temperaments of interacting sociotypes. Partners acquire flexibility in behavior, rapid switching from one mode of action to another.
The key word for them is RESONANCE. Resonance in Latin means an echo, echo. In order for the buildup to occur, the partners must forcibly synchronize the “natural frequencies”, as if “sound” one inside the other.

Business - working resonance. The buildup in action. Hierarchy is required for work, so a leader is put forward in the dyad. True, his right is challenged. When he comes to a standstill, the roles change.

---

Cautious monotony:  Communication is not particularly attractive, but initially there is interest and respect for your business partner, albeit with a touch of formality. After a while, you discover that your partner values you quite lowly not having any reason for it. Responding in kind, you strive to put him into place, to prove the opposite. Prolonged contact is tiring, because you have neither the desire nor the energy to somehow diversify the "gray days". Over time, reciprocity and sense of commonality is upset even further.

---

Business (Irrational Relation): Business relationships develop into rivalry styles of behavior, they require constant “probing” of a competitor that is not inferior to you. In a mobilized state, relations improve, partners quickly unite against a common enemy or common difficulty. A calm state worsens them, insults on trifles begin to arise. A couple can eagerly seek out weak points in each other's position.

Business (Logical Relation): Logic based business relationships. They make people calculating, weighing and evaluating everything from a pragmatic point of view. One logical plan is replaced by another, each insists on its own version. Feelings are wholly subordinate to the logic of achieving success in a cohesive business couple.

Business (Sensory Relation): Business relationships enhance the strength of sensory partners, make them more competitive, develop the ability to realistically assess the balance of power. A business couple should not take on long-term goals. These relationships encourage partners to achieve short-term goals that promise tangible returns.

Business (Static Relation): Business relationships are also built on a balance of power. But unlike the superego, here the partners do not restore, but rather seek to break the balance in their favor. These relationships tire of the continuous struggle for credibility, leadership, significance. In disputes, they are not looking for the truth, but grope for weak points in the position of the other side.

Business (Involutionary Relation): In business relations, partners act with seemingly similar methods, but achieve completely different goals. Therefore, increasing competition, throwing both back. After rethinking their actions, the partners come together again for a new leap forward and an even more dangerous failure. Everyone thinks that the goal for others is wrong. In the later stages of business development, any desire to be similar to each other is lost.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Psychosophy Clubs and Sextas

SHS Subtypes Reference 2022

My General Understanding of Psychosophy